Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier
Kenneth J. Sytsma, J. Chris Pires
Abstract
Kenneth J. Sytsma, J. Chris Pires
Abstract
Summary Sytsma, K. J. & Pires, J. C.: Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier. ‐ Taxon 50: 713–732. 2001. ‐ ISSN 0040‐0262. In the historical context of plant systematics over the last 50 years, systematics is examined in terms of where it is now, where it is headed, where it should be, and how it should get there. Issues and concerns of the past decades are still with us today. Molecular systematics has become the over‐arching field in systematics, but each of eight other areas (genome, chromosomes, morphology and anatomy, development, population biology, speciation, floristics and monography, nomenclature and classification) are evaluated. A revolution in systematics is not necessary for the next 50 years in plant systematics. What is needed is a re‐mapping of our discipline that involves four elements for the future growth and health of botanical systematics: plant systematics and its utility, dialogue with other disciplines, multi‐disciplinary training, and a pluralistic viewpoint.
OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summary Sytsma, K. J. & Pires, J. C.: Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier. ‐ Taxon 50: 713–732. 2001. ‐ ISSN 0040‐0262. In the historical context of plant systematics over the last 50 years, systematics is examined in terms of where it is now, where it is headed, where it should be, and how it should get there. Issues and concerns of the past decades are still with us today. Molecular systematics has become the over‐arching field in systematics, but each of eight other areas (genome, chromosomes, morphology and anatomy, development, population biology, speciation, floristics and monography, nomenclature and classification) are evaluated. A revolution in systematics is not necessary for the next 50 years in plant systematics. What is needed is a re‐mapping of our discipline that involves four elements for the future growth and health of botanical systematics: plant systematics and its utility, dialogue with other disciplines, multi‐disciplinary training, and a pluralistic viewpoint.
Key concepts: Systematics, Context (archaeology), Taxon, Frontier, Biology, Nomenclature, Zoology, Evolutionary biology