2001TaxonRequires access

Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier

Kenneth J. Sytsma, J. Chris Pires

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Summary Sytsma, K. J. & Pires, J. C.: Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier. ‐ Taxon 50: 713–732. 2001. ‐ ISSN 0040‐0262. In the historical context of plant systematics over the last 50 years, systematics is examined in terms of where it is now, where it is headed, where it should be, and how it should get there. Issues and concerns of the past decades are still with us today. Molecular systematics has become the over‐arching field in systematics, but each of eight other areas (genome, chromosomes, morphology and anatomy, development, population biology, speciation, floristics and monography, nomenclature and classification) are evaluated. A revolution in systematics is not necessary for the next 50 years in plant systematics. What is needed is a re‐mapping of our discipline that involves four elements for the future growth and health of botanical systematics: plant systematics and its utility, dialogue with other disciplines, multi‐disciplinary training, and a pluralistic viewpoint.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Sytsma, K. J. & Pires, J. C.: Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier. ‐ Taxon 50: 713–732. 2001. ‐ ISSN 0040‐0262. In the historical context of plant systematics over the last 50 years, systematics is examined in terms of where it is now, where it is headed, where it should be, and how it should get there. Issues and concerns of the past decades are still with us today. Molecular systematics has become the over‐arching field in systematics, but each of eight other areas (genome, chromosomes, morphology and anatomy, development, population biology, speciation, floristics and monography, nomenclature and classification) are evaluated. A revolution in systematics is not necessary for the next 50 years in plant systematics. What is needed is a re‐mapping of our discipline that involves four elements for the future growth and health of botanical systematics: plant systematics and its utility, dialogue with other disciplines, multi‐disciplinary training, and a pluralistic viewpoint.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Sytsma, K. J. & Pires, J. C.: Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier. ‐ Taxon 50: 713–732. 2001. ‐ ISSN 0040‐0262. In the historical context of plant systematics over the last 50 years, systematics is examined in terms of where it is now, where it is headed, where it should be, and how it should get there. Issues and concerns of the past decades are still with us today. Molecular systematics has become the over‐arching field in systematics, but each of eight other areas (genome, chromosomes, morphology and anatomy, development, population biology, speciation, floristics and monography, nomenclature and classification) are evaluated. A revolution in systematics is not necessary for the next 50 years in plant systematics. What is needed is a re‐mapping of our discipline that involves four elements for the future growth and health of botanical systematics: plant systematics and its utility, dialogue with other disciplines, multi‐disciplinary training, and a pluralistic viewpoint.

Key concepts: Systematics, Context (archaeology), Taxon, Frontier, Biology, Nomenclature, Zoology, Evolutionary biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Plant systematics in the next 50 years—re‐mapping the new frontier — Research Paper | ScholarLens