2013Architecture and CultureRequires access

Sound, Aurality and Critical Listening: Disruptions at the Boundaries of Architecture

Michael Fowler

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

In this article, I briefly introduce the disciplines of soundscape studies, aural architecture and the notion of critical listening through creative examples from my own practice as a sound designer. Three sound installations, Acoustic Intersections (2006), Urban Ephemeral Room (2008) and Choreographies of Inhabitation (2009) present my modus operandi. These works aim to explore the boundaries between architecture and aural design by offering novel design methods that may assist in extending the manner in which the discipline of architecture is practiced, theorized and discussed. Finally, I offer a discussion on the disciplinary boundaries between soundscape studies, aural architecture and architecture, and how these boundaries may be destabilized and extended through an uptake of interdisciplinary practices and the notion of critical listening. The examination argues that the relationship between aural design and architecture is a symbiotic one.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this article, I briefly introduce the disciplines of soundscape studies, aural architecture and the notion of critical listening through creative examples from my own practice as a sound designer. Three sound installations, Acoustic Intersections (2006), Urban Ephemeral Room (2008) and Choreographies of Inhabitation (2009) present my modus operandi. These works aim to explore the boundaries between architecture and aural design by offering novel design methods that may assist in extending the manner in which the discipline of architecture is practiced, theorized and discussed. Finally, I offer a discussion on the disciplinary boundaries between soundscape studies, aural architecture and architecture, and how these boundaries may be destabilized and extended through an uptake of interdisciplinary practices and the notion of critical listening. The examination argues that the relationship between aural design and architecture is a symbiotic one.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this article, I briefly introduce the disciplines of soundscape studies, aural architecture and the notion of critical listening through creative examples from my own practice as a sound designer. Three sound installations, Acoustic Intersections (2006), Urban Ephemeral Room (2008) and Choreographies of Inhabitation (2009) present my modus operandi. These works aim to explore the boundaries between architecture and aural design by offering novel design methods that may assist in extending the manner in which the discipline of architecture is practiced, theorized and discussed. Finally, I offer a discussion on the disciplinary boundaries between soundscape studies, aural architecture and architecture, and how these boundaries may be destabilized and extended through an uptake of interdisciplinary practices and the notion of critical listening. The examination argues that the relationship between aural design and architecture is a symbiotic one.

Key concepts: Soundscape, Architecture, Active listening, Sound art, Ephemeral key, Sound design, Discipline, Sound (geography)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sound, Aurality and Critical Listening: Disruptions at the Boundaries of Architecture — Research Paper | ScholarLens