1982•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaOpen access

Melodic octave tuning; separable dimensions of perception

Scott Makeig, Gerald J. Balzano

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Ascending and descending digitally synthesized pure-tone melodic octaves in the range 250–1500 Hz, varying width from 1180¢ to 1220¢ were presented to nine highly musical subjects who were asked to judge (1) degree of octave mistuning, and (2) whether the second tone of the pair was sharp or flat. Results confirm the existence of so-called “octave stretch” previously reported in the literature. However, the two tasks were found to be perceptually dissimilar in degree of octave stretch, variability, and dependence on register. Consistent with results of Lindqvist and Sandberg (VIIth Int. Congr. Acoust., 1971] preferred “octave stretch” for the “sense of mistuning” judgments was very small (about 2.5¢) for low register octaves. An additional significant finding was that melodic octaves whose second tone was flat relative to an adjudged “in tune” octave were called more “mistuned” than octaves whose second tone was equally sharp. Together, these results imply that perception of octave tuning does not amount to a one-dimensional judgment of log frequency difference, but is multidimensional in nature.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ascending and descending digitally synthesized pure-tone melodic octaves in the range 250–1500 Hz, varying width from 1180¢ to 1220¢ were presented to nine highly musical subjects who were asked to judge (1) degree of octave mistuning, and (2) whether the second tone of the pair was sharp or flat. Results confirm the existence of so-called “octave stretch” previously reported in the literature. However, the two tasks were found to be perceptually dissimilar in degree of octave stretch, variability, and dependence on register. Consistent with results of Lindqvist and Sandberg (VIIth Int. Congr. Acoust., 1971] preferred “octave stretch” for the “sense of mistuning” judgments was very small (about 2.5¢) for low register octaves. An additional significant finding was that melodic octaves whose second tone was flat relative to an adjudged “in tune” octave were called more “mistuned” than octaves whose second tone was equally sharp. Together, these results imply that perception of octave tuning does not amount to a one-dimensional judgment of log frequency difference, but is multidimensional in nature.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ascending and descending digitally synthesized pure-tone melodic octaves in the range 250–1500 Hz, varying width from 1180¢ to 1220¢ were presented to nine highly musical subjects who were asked to judge (1) degree of octave mistuning, and (2) whether the second tone of the pair was sharp or flat. Results confirm the existence of so-called “octave stretch” previously reported in the literature. However, the two tasks were found to be perceptually dissimilar in degree of octave stretch, variability, and dependence on register. Consistent with results of Lindqvist and Sandberg (VIIth Int. Congr. Acoust., 1971] preferred “octave stretch” for the “sense of mistuning” judgments was very small (about 2.5¢) for low register octaves. An additional significant finding was that melodic octaves whose second tone was flat relative to an adjudged “in tune” octave were called more “mistuned” than octaves whose second tone was equally sharp. Together, these results imply that perception of octave tuning does not amount to a one-dimensional judgment of log frequency difference, but is multidimensional in nature.

Key concepts: Octave (electronics), Mistuning, Melody, Tone (literature), Acoustics, Register (sociolinguistics), Mathematics, Degree (music)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Melodic octave tuning; separable dimensions of perception — Research Paper | ScholarLens