1999•LangmuirRequires access

Are the Interfacial Basicities of Aqueous Cationic Micelles and Cationic Reverse Microemulsions Different by Orders of Magnitude?

Prasanta Kumar Das, Arabinda Chaudhuri

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Formation of 5-hexadecyl-7-methylindazole (16-Ind) from 2,6-dimethyl-4-hexadecylbenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate (16-ArN 2 + ) bound to aqueous cationic micelles (prepared in aqueous buffers of pH 7.0) has been shown to originate from the remarkably high interfacial basicity of aqueous cationic micelles. The rationale behind our conclusion is that formation of indazole from o -methylarenediazonium salts has never been observed if the medium of the diazonium salts is not basic. On the same ground, the absence of any 16-Ind product from 16-ArN 2 + in cationic reverse microemulsions is consistent with the interfacial basicities of cationic reverse microemulsions being significantly lower than that of cationic micelles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Formation of 5-hexadecyl-7-methylindazole (16-Ind) from 2,6-dimethyl-4-hexadecylbenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate (16-ArN 2 + ) bound to aqueous cationic micelles (prepared in aqueous buffers of pH 7.0) has been shown to originate from the remarkably high interfacial basicity of aqueous cationic micelles. The rationale behind our conclusion is that formation of indazole from o -methylarenediazonium salts has never been observed if the medium of the diazonium salts is not basic. On the same ground, the absence of any 16-Ind product from 16-ArN 2 + in cationic reverse microemulsions is consistent with the interfacial basicities of cationic reverse microemulsions being significantly lower than that of cationic micelles.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Formation of 5-hexadecyl-7-methylindazole (16-Ind) from 2,6-dimethyl-4-hexadecylbenzenediazonium tetrafluoroborate (16-ArN 2 + ) bound to aqueous cationic micelles (prepared in aqueous buffers of pH 7.0) has been shown to originate from the remarkably high interfacial basicity of aqueous cationic micelles. The rationale behind our conclusion is that formation of indazole from o -methylarenediazonium salts has never been observed if the medium of the diazonium salts is not basic. On the same ground, the absence of any 16-Ind product from 16-ArN 2 + in cationic reverse microemulsions is consistent with the interfacial basicities of cationic reverse microemulsions being significantly lower than that of cationic micelles.

Key concepts: Cationic polymerization, Microemulsion, Micelle, Chemistry, Aqueous solution, Tetrafluoroborate, Inorganic chemistry, Polymer chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are the Interfacial Basicities of Aqueous Cationic Micelles and Cationic Reverse Microemulsions Different by Orders of Magnitude? — Research Paper | ScholarLens