1995Stem CellsRequires access

Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (filgrastim) after conventional chemotherapy in children with cancer

Pekka Riikonen, Jaana Rahiala, Marjut Salonvaara, Mikko Perkkiö

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

We evaluated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to courses of conventional chemotherapy in 16 children with cancer. One course followed by G-CSF (20 episodes) was compared to identical courses without G-CSF (20 episodes) in the same patients. The mean duration of G-CSF therapy was 8.8 (5-13) days. The periods of neutropenia (4.8 days versus 16.5 days; p < 0.0001), days of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (13 days versus 65 days; p = 0.02) and days on broad-spectrum antibiotics (13 days versus 95 days; p = 0.003) were significantly reduced. With the use of G-CSF the profound neutropenia could be prevented in 11 (55%) episodes. There were two episodes of fever and neutropenia in the G-CSF group as compared to 10 febrile neutropenias in the control group (p = 0.04). G-CSF was well tolerated and did not cause additional expenses when compared to the expenses needed for the treatment of febrile neutropenias. The cost benefit analyses showed that through using G-CSF a savings was realized in the amount of U.S. $20,650 for 20 cycles of chemotherapy, i.e., U.S. $1,033/chemotherapy cycle. We conclude that the use of G-CSF was efficacious and did not increase the total costs of therapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We evaluated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to courses of conventional chemotherapy in 16 children with cancer. One course followed by G-CSF (20 episodes) was compared to identical courses without G-CSF (20 episodes) in the same patients. The mean duration of G-CSF therapy was 8.8 (5-13) days. The periods of neutropenia (4.8 days versus 16.5 days; p < 0.0001), days of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (13 days versus 65 days; p = 0.02) and days on broad-spectrum antibiotics (13 days versus 95 days; p = 0.003) were significantly reduced. With the use of G-CSF the profound neutropenia could be prevented in 11 (55%) episodes. There were two episodes of fever and neutropenia in the G-CSF group as compared to 10 febrile neutropenias in the control group (p = 0.04). G-CSF was well tolerated and did not cause additional expenses when compared to the expenses needed for the treatment of febrile neutropenias. The cost benefit analyses showed that through using G-CSF a savings was realized in the amount of U.S. $20,650 for 20 cycles of chemotherapy, i.e., U.S. $1,033/chemotherapy cycle. We conclude that the use of G-CSF was efficacious and did not increase the total costs of therapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We evaluated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to courses of conventional chemotherapy in 16 children with cancer. One course followed by G-CSF (20 episodes) was compared to identical courses without G-CSF (20 episodes) in the same patients. The mean duration of G-CSF therapy was 8.8 (5-13) days. The periods of neutropenia (4.8 days versus 16.5 days; p < 0.0001), days of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (13 days versus 65 days; p = 0.02) and days on broad-spectrum antibiotics (13 days versus 95 days; p = 0.003) were significantly reduced. With the use of G-CSF the profound neutropenia could be prevented in 11 (55%) episodes. There were two episodes of fever and neutropenia in the G-CSF group as compared to 10 febrile neutropenias in the control group (p = 0.04). G-CSF was well tolerated and did not cause additional expenses when compared to the expenses needed for the treatment of febrile neutropenias. The cost benefit analyses showed that through using G-CSF a savings was realized in the amount of U.S. $20,650 for 20 cycles of chemotherapy, i.e., U.S. $1,033/chemotherapy cycle. We conclude that the use of G-CSF was efficacious and did not increase the total costs of therapy.

Key concepts: Filgrastim, Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, Neutropenia, Chemotherapy, Febrile neutropenia, Granulocyte, Internal medicine, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (filgrastim) after conventional chemotherapy in children with cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens