1982Unpublished venueOpen access

The Federal Supplemental Benefits Program: An Appraisal of Emergency Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Walter Corson, Walter Nicholson

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Proposals to temporarily extend unemployment benefits have been considered during every recession since World War II.The Federal Supplemental Benefits (FSB) program of 1974 has so far been the largest and most costly of these programs.This analysis and evaluation of the FSB program addresses policy issues currently under discussion in regard to the rationale for and performance of such emergency ex tensions.In examining both the specific FSB program and the more general question of whether benefits should be extended dur ing recessions, the authors explore a number of approaches to estimating social benefits and costs.They recommend a cautious approach to emergency extension policies, sug gesting that such programs be considered only during especially severe recessions.Facts and observations presented in this study are the sole responsibility of the authors.Their viewpoints do not necessarily represent positions of the W.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Proposals to temporarily extend unemployment benefits have been considered during every recession since World War II.The Federal Supplemental Benefits (FSB) program of 1974 has so far been the largest and most costly of these programs.This analysis and evaluation of the FSB program addresses policy issues currently under discussion in regard to the rationale for and performance of such emergency ex tensions.In examining both the specific FSB program and the more general question of whether benefits should be extended dur ing recessions, the authors explore a number of approaches to estimating social benefits and costs.They recommend a cautious approach to emergency extension policies, sug gesting that such programs be considered only during especially severe recessions.Facts and observations presented in this study are the sole responsibility of the authors.Their viewpoints do not necessarily represent positions of the W.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Proposals to temporarily extend unemployment benefits have been considered during every recession since World War II.The Federal Supplemental Benefits (FSB) program of 1974 has so far been the largest and most costly of these programs.This analysis and evaluation of the FSB program addresses policy issues currently under discussion in regard to the rationale for and performance of such emergency ex tensions.In examining both the specific FSB program and the more general question of whether benefits should be extended dur ing recessions, the authors explore a number of approaches to estimating social benefits and costs.They recommend a cautious approach to emergency extension policies, sug gesting that such programs be considered only during especially severe recessions.Facts and observations presented in this study are the sole responsibility of the authors.Their viewpoints do not necessarily represent positions of the W.

Key concepts: Unemployment, Business, Actuarial science, Economics, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Federal Supplemental Benefits Program: An Appraisal of Emergency Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits — Research Paper | ScholarLens