1971The Journal of Experimental EducationRequires access

College Dropout Identification

William C. Blanchfield

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

The process of selecting and evaluating high school students for the scarce openings in our colleges goes on continuously. The process may be informal interviews and personal judgment being the major ingredients; or it may be a highly structured mathematical process, most often using regression-correlation techniques. Neither method has been distinguished by its success. The shortcomings of the subjective approach are obvious: too often the interview is hurried and the important indicators of possible success in college are not uncovered. The structured research has most often been an attempt to predict future quality point averages using prior data. The reasons for the lack of previous success in the structured research are twofold: 1.) Regression-correlation is only suitable when the prior data is adequately separated; and 2.) The premise upon which the technique is based is not suitable: that is, that it is possible to rank students in a significant manner to predict future success or failure. Rather than ranking students on a scale, the emphasis should be on identifying potentially successful or dropout students. The technique ideally suited for this is Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The process of selecting and evaluating high school students for the scarce openings in our colleges goes on continuously. The process may be informal interviews and personal judgment being the major ingredients; or it may be a highly structured mathematical process, most often using regression-correlation techniques. Neither method has been distinguished by its success. The shortcomings of the subjective approach are obvious: too often the interview is hurried and the important indicators of possible success in college are not uncovered. The structured research has most often been an attempt to predict future quality point averages using prior data. The reasons for the lack of previous success in the structured research are twofold: 1.) Regression-correlation is only suitable when the prior data is adequately separated; and 2.) The premise upon which the technique is based is not suitable: that is, that it is possible to rank students in a significant manner to predict future success or failure. Rather than ranking students on a scale, the emphasis should be on identifying potentially successful or dropout students. The technique ideally suited for this is Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The process of selecting and evaluating high school students for the scarce openings in our colleges goes on continuously. The process may be informal interviews and personal judgment being the major ingredients; or it may be a highly structured mathematical process, most often using regression-correlation techniques. Neither method has been distinguished by its success. The shortcomings of the subjective approach are obvious: too often the interview is hurried and the important indicators of possible success in college are not uncovered. The structured research has most often been an attempt to predict future quality point averages using prior data. The reasons for the lack of previous success in the structured research are twofold: 1.) Regression-correlation is only suitable when the prior data is adequately separated; and 2.) The premise upon which the technique is based is not suitable: that is, that it is possible to rank students in a significant manner to predict future success or failure. Rather than ranking students on a scale, the emphasis should be on identifying potentially successful or dropout students. The technique ideally suited for this is Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA).

Key concepts: Dropout (neural networks), Premise, Ranking (information retrieval), Identification (biology), Process (computing), Quality (philosophy), Rank (graph theory), Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
College Dropout Identification — Research Paper | ScholarLens