1979EcographyRequires access

Phytoplankton diversity in Lake Norrviken 1961–1975

Lena Tinnberg

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Five common indices were compared to see which of them would be most suitable in the study of long time changes in a phytoplankton community. Margalefs index d showed the same course during the year as did the number of species. This is also valid for Brillouin's, Shannon's, Simpson's and McIntosh's indices when based on number of individuals. Brillouin's and Shannon's indices based on cell number were found to differ from the diversity values obtained by Simpson's and McIntosh's indices depending on their different sensitivity to the two components of diversity, species richness and species evenness. Diversity indices including species richness and evenness (e.g. all except Margalef's) are recommended, but their different sensitivity to their species richness and evenness component should not be overlooked. A description of the phytoplankton composition should always be given together with diversity indices. This is very important since any index used gives no information on the species and their ecology.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Five common indices were compared to see which of them would be most suitable in the study of long time changes in a phytoplankton community. Margalefs index d showed the same course during the year as did the number of species. This is also valid for Brillouin's, Shannon's, Simpson's and McIntosh's indices when based on number of individuals. Brillouin's and Shannon's indices based on cell number were found to differ from the diversity values obtained by Simpson's and McIntosh's indices depending on their different sensitivity to the two components of diversity, species richness and species evenness. Diversity indices including species richness and evenness (e.g. all except Margalef's) are recommended, but their different sensitivity to their species richness and evenness component should not be overlooked. A description of the phytoplankton composition should always be given together with diversity indices. This is very important since any index used gives no information on the species and their ecology.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Five common indices were compared to see which of them would be most suitable in the study of long time changes in a phytoplankton community. Margalefs index d showed the same course during the year as did the number of species. This is also valid for Brillouin's, Shannon's, Simpson's and McIntosh's indices when based on number of individuals. Brillouin's and Shannon's indices based on cell number were found to differ from the diversity values obtained by Simpson's and McIntosh's indices depending on their different sensitivity to the two components of diversity, species richness and species evenness. Diversity indices including species richness and evenness (e.g. all except Margalef's) are recommended, but their different sensitivity to their species richness and evenness component should not be overlooked. A description of the phytoplankton composition should always be given together with diversity indices. This is very important since any index used gives no information on the species and their ecology.

Key concepts: Species richness, Species evenness, Diversity index, Ecology, Species diversity, Phytoplankton, Alpha diversity, Gamma diversity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phytoplankton diversity in Lake Norrviken 1961–1975 — Research Paper | ScholarLens