2009International Journal of Liability and Scientific EnquiryRequires access

The right to die: does the state lose an interest in a dying patient's life?

Kevin James LeBlanc

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In 2008, Washington approved a Death with Dignity Act modelled after a similar law enacted in Oregon in 1993. These laws allow terminally ill patients to seek Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS). The US Supreme Court has not acknowledged a fundamental right to die and opponents of the Death with Dignity Acts have sought to strike these statutes down as being unconstitutional. This comment evaluates the similarities between Washington and Oregon's PAS statute and proposes that the US Supreme Court recognise that the state may have a declining interest in a terminally ill patient's life. As the state's interest continues to decrease, the terminally ill patient has an increasing right to seek PAS, so long as the PAS laws provide strict limitations on treatment and narrowly define terminally ill.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2008, Washington approved a Death with Dignity Act modelled after a similar law enacted in Oregon in 1993. These laws allow terminally ill patients to seek Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS). The US Supreme Court has not acknowledged a fundamental right to die and opponents of the Death with Dignity Acts have sought to strike these statutes down as being unconstitutional. This comment evaluates the similarities between Washington and Oregon's PAS statute and proposes that the US Supreme Court recognise that the state may have a declining interest in a terminally ill patient's life. As the state's interest continues to decrease, the terminally ill patient has an increasing right to seek PAS, so long as the PAS laws provide strict limitations on treatment and narrowly define terminally ill.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2008, Washington approved a Death with Dignity Act modelled after a similar law enacted in Oregon in 1993. These laws allow terminally ill patients to seek Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS). The US Supreme Court has not acknowledged a fundamental right to die and opponents of the Death with Dignity Acts have sought to strike these statutes down as being unconstitutional. This comment evaluates the similarities between Washington and Oregon's PAS statute and proposes that the US Supreme Court recognise that the state may have a declining interest in a terminally ill patient's life. As the state's interest continues to decrease, the terminally ill patient has an increasing right to seek PAS, so long as the PAS laws provide strict limitations on treatment and narrowly define terminally ill.

Key concepts: Death with dignity, Terminally ill, Supreme court, Statute, Right to die, Law, Dignity, Assisted suicide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The right to die: does the state lose an interest in a dying patient's life? — Research Paper | ScholarLens