The right to die: does the state lose an interest in a dying patient's life?
Kevin James LeBlanc
Abstract
Kevin James LeBlanc
Abstract
In 2008, Washington approved a Death with Dignity Act modelled after a similar law enacted in Oregon in 1993. These laws allow terminally ill patients to seek Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS). The US Supreme Court has not acknowledged a fundamental right to die and opponents of the Death with Dignity Acts have sought to strike these statutes down as being unconstitutional. This comment evaluates the similarities between Washington and Oregon's PAS statute and proposes that the US Supreme Court recognise that the state may have a declining interest in a terminally ill patient's life. As the state's interest continues to decrease, the terminally ill patient has an increasing right to seek PAS, so long as the PAS laws provide strict limitations on treatment and narrowly define terminally ill.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In 2008, Washington approved a Death with Dignity Act modelled after a similar law enacted in Oregon in 1993. These laws allow terminally ill patients to seek Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS). The US Supreme Court has not acknowledged a fundamental right to die and opponents of the Death with Dignity Acts have sought to strike these statutes down as being unconstitutional. This comment evaluates the similarities between Washington and Oregon's PAS statute and proposes that the US Supreme Court recognise that the state may have a declining interest in a terminally ill patient's life. As the state's interest continues to decrease, the terminally ill patient has an increasing right to seek PAS, so long as the PAS laws provide strict limitations on treatment and narrowly define terminally ill.
Key concepts: Death with dignity, Terminally ill, Supreme court, Statute, Right to die, Law, Dignity, Assisted suicide