2004Journal of Field OrnithologyRequires access

Field evidence of predator discrimination abilities in American Avocets and Black-necked Stilts

Tex A. Sordahl

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

American Avocets (Recurvirostra americana) and Black-necked Stilts (Himantopus mexicanus) are large ground-nesting shorebirds whose eggs and flightless chicks are exposed to a variety of predators during a period of approximately two months. Parents respond to potential predators by ignoring them, by performing a variety of diversionary displays, or by aggressive mobbing. I observed the responses of avocets and stilts to natural predators and to predator models placed near their nests. Responses to mammals were relatively weak, involving mostly aerial circling and terrestrial distraction displays, and mammals rarely were mobbed. Responses to birds were more aerial, with ground displays rarely used, and birds often were mobbed. The response to humans was intermediate between the responses to other mammalian predators and to avian predators, and involved both distraction displays and mobbing. The number of avocets and stilts participating in mobbing eight different avian predators correlated with a subjective ranking of the danger the predators posed to mobbing adults. Mobbing of gulls, raptors, and herons was consistent with the hypothesis that avocet and stilt mobbing behavior is influenced by the relative threat of particular predators to eggs versus chicks. Overall, the observations reported here provide evidence that parent avocets and stilts discriminate among predators on the basis of both the risk to the adults of mobbing the predator and the risk to the eggs or chicks of not doing so.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

American Avocets (Recurvirostra americana) and Black-necked Stilts (Himantopus mexicanus) are large ground-nesting shorebirds whose eggs and flightless chicks are exposed to a variety of predators during a period of approximately two months. Parents respond to potential predators by ignoring them, by performing a variety of diversionary displays, or by aggressive mobbing. I observed the responses of avocets and stilts to natural predators and to predator models placed near their nests. Responses to mammals were relatively weak, involving mostly aerial circling and terrestrial distraction displays, and mammals rarely were mobbed. Responses to birds were more aerial, with ground displays rarely used, and birds often were mobbed. The response to humans was intermediate between the responses to other mammalian predators and to avian predators, and involved both distraction displays and mobbing. The number of avocets and stilts participating in mobbing eight different avian predators correlated with a subjective ranking of the danger the predators posed to mobbing adults. Mobbing of gulls, raptors, and herons was consistent with the hypothesis that avocet and stilt mobbing behavior is influenced by the relative threat of particular predators to eggs versus chicks. Overall, the observations reported here provide evidence that parent avocets and stilts discriminate among predators on the basis of both the risk to the adults of mobbing the predator and the risk to the eggs or chicks of not doing so.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

American Avocets (Recurvirostra americana) and Black-necked Stilts (Himantopus mexicanus) are large ground-nesting shorebirds whose eggs and flightless chicks are exposed to a variety of predators during a period of approximately two months. Parents respond to potential predators by ignoring them, by performing a variety of diversionary displays, or by aggressive mobbing. I observed the responses of avocets and stilts to natural predators and to predator models placed near their nests. Responses to mammals were relatively weak, involving mostly aerial circling and terrestrial distraction displays, and mammals rarely were mobbed. Responses to birds were more aerial, with ground displays rarely used, and birds often were mobbed. The response to humans was intermediate between the responses to other mammalian predators and to avian predators, and involved both distraction displays and mobbing. The number of avocets and stilts participating in mobbing eight different avian predators correlated with a subjective ranking of the danger the predators posed to mobbing adults. Mobbing of gulls, raptors, and herons was consistent with the hypothesis that avocet and stilt mobbing behavior is influenced by the relative threat of particular predators to eggs versus chicks. Overall, the observations reported here provide evidence that parent avocets and stilts discriminate among predators on the basis of both the risk to the adults of mobbing the predator and the risk to the eggs or chicks of not doing so.

Key concepts: Mobbing, Predation, Predator, Biology, Zoology, Ecology, Psychology, Psychotherapist

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field evidence of predator discrimination abilities in American Avocets and Black-necked Stilts — Research Paper | ScholarLens