Comparison of low-osmolar contrast media in cardiac angiography
Robert James Peck, M. J. Bull, D.C. Cumberland
Abstract
Robert James Peck, M. J. Bull, D.C. Cumberland
Abstract
Two hundred and twenty-five patients investigated by left ventricular, coronary artery and/or proximal aortic angiography were randomly assigned to one of three contrast medium groups (Hexabrix 320, Niopam 300 or Omnipaque 300). Subjective response to injection of contrast medium was noted at the time of investigation and during the next 24 h. No significant difference was found between the three currently available low-osmolar contrast media.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two hundred and twenty-five patients investigated by left ventricular, coronary artery and/or proximal aortic angiography were randomly assigned to one of three contrast medium groups (Hexabrix 320, Niopam 300 or Omnipaque 300). Subjective response to injection of contrast medium was noted at the time of investigation and during the next 24 h. No significant difference was found between the three currently available low-osmolar contrast media.
Key concepts: Medicine, Contrast (vision), Contrast medium, Coronary angiography, Angiography, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Radiology