2009•International Journal of TestingRequires access

A Range-Null Hypothesis Approach for Testing DIF under the Rasch Model

Craig S. Wells, Allan S. Cohen, Jeffrey M. Patton

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

A primary concern with testing differential item functioning (DIF) using a traditional point-null hypothesis is that a statistically significant result does not imply that the magnitude of DIF is of practical interest. Similarly, for a given sample size, a non-significant result does not allow the researcher to conclude the item is free of DIF. To address these weaknesses, two types of range-null hypotheses utilizing Lord's χ2 DIF statistic were presented. The first type tests a null hypothesis whose rejection implies the item exhibits a meaningful magnitude of DIF, while the second type tests a null hypothesis whose rejection implies the item is effectively free of DIF. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the empirical Type I error rate and power of both types of range-null hypothesis tests under two crossed factors: test length (20 and 60 items) and sample size per group (2500, 5000, 10,000, and 20,000 examinees). The proposed statistic controlled the Type I error rates over all conditions and demonstrated acceptable power for sample size conditions of 5000 and larger. The implications of using the range-null hypothesis approach in practice are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A primary concern with testing differential item functioning (DIF) using a traditional point-null hypothesis is that a statistically significant result does not imply that the magnitude of DIF is of practical interest. Similarly, for a given sample size, a non-significant result does not allow the researcher to conclude the item is free of DIF. To address these weaknesses, two types of range-null hypotheses utilizing Lord's χ2 DIF statistic were presented. The first type tests a null hypothesis whose rejection implies the item exhibits a meaningful magnitude of DIF, while the second type tests a null hypothesis whose rejection implies the item is effectively free of DIF. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the empirical Type I error rate and power of both types of range-null hypothesis tests under two crossed factors: test length (20 and 60 items) and sample size per group (2500, 5000, 10,000, and 20,000 examinees). The proposed statistic controlled the Type I error rates over all conditions and demonstrated acceptable power for sample size conditions of 5000 and larger. The implications of using the range-null hypothesis approach in practice are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A primary concern with testing differential item functioning (DIF) using a traditional point-null hypothesis is that a statistically significant result does not imply that the magnitude of DIF is of practical interest. Similarly, for a given sample size, a non-significant result does not allow the researcher to conclude the item is free of DIF. To address these weaknesses, two types of range-null hypotheses utilizing Lord's χ2 DIF statistic were presented. The first type tests a null hypothesis whose rejection implies the item exhibits a meaningful magnitude of DIF, while the second type tests a null hypothesis whose rejection implies the item is effectively free of DIF. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the empirical Type I error rate and power of both types of range-null hypothesis tests under two crossed factors: test length (20 and 60 items) and sample size per group (2500, 5000, 10,000, and 20,000 examinees). The proposed statistic controlled the Type I error rates over all conditions and demonstrated acceptable power for sample size conditions of 5000 and larger. The implications of using the range-null hypothesis approach in practice are discussed.

Key concepts: Type I and type II errors, Differential item functioning, Null hypothesis, Statistics, Rasch model, Null (SQL), Sample size determination, One- and two-tailed tests

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Range-Null Hypothesis Approach for Testing DIF under the Rasch Model — Research Paper | ScholarLens