2011International Journal of OdonatologyOpen access

Dragons fly, biologists classify: an overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior

Elizabeth F. Ballare, Jessica L. Ware

Open full text 29 citations

Abstract

Among insects, perhaps the most appreciated are those that are esthetically pleasing: few capture the interest of the public as much as vibrantly colored dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata).These remarkable insects are also extensively studied.Here, we review the history of odonate systematics, with an emphasis on discrepancies among studies.Over the past century, relationships among Odonata have been reinterpreted many times, using a variety of data from wing vein morphology to DNA.Despite years of study, there has been little consensus about odonate taxonomy.In this review, we compare odonate molecular phylogenetic studies with respect to gene and model selection, optimality criterion, and dataset completeness.These differences are discussed in relation to the evolution of dragonfly behavior.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Among insects, perhaps the most appreciated are those that are esthetically pleasing: few capture the interest of the public as much as vibrantly colored dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata).These remarkable insects are also extensively studied.Here, we review the history of odonate systematics, with an emphasis on discrepancies among studies.Over the past century, relationships among Odonata have been reinterpreted many times, using a variety of data from wing vein morphology to DNA.Despite years of study, there has been little consensus about odonate taxonomy.In this review, we compare odonate molecular phylogenetic studies with respect to gene and model selection, optimality criterion, and dataset completeness.These differences are discussed in relation to the evolution of dragonfly behavior.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Among insects, perhaps the most appreciated are those that are esthetically pleasing: few capture the interest of the public as much as vibrantly colored dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata).These remarkable insects are also extensively studied.Here, we review the history of odonate systematics, with an emphasis on discrepancies among studies.Over the past century, relationships among Odonata have been reinterpreted many times, using a variety of data from wing vein morphology to DNA.Despite years of study, there has been little consensus about odonate taxonomy.In this review, we compare odonate molecular phylogenetic studies with respect to gene and model selection, optimality criterion, and dataset completeness.These differences are discussed in relation to the evolution of dragonfly behavior.

Key concepts: Odonata, Dragonfly, Damselfly, Biology, Coenagrionidae, Ecology, Evolutionary biology, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dragons fly, biologists classify: an overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior — Research Paper | ScholarLens