1966The Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceRequires access

Human Relations Training and Interracial Social Action: Problems in Self and Client Definition

Martin Lakin

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This paper reviews the efforts of a group of human relations trainers, varying widely in experience, who volunteered to help conduct a training conference for civil rights workers and volunteers. The experience, described as ineffective, is shared as a model of pitfalls which could be characteristic of training with groups committed to social action where the training function is less clearly defined than in "conventional" training laboratories. The author concludes that laboratory training techniques and values do have relevance for complex social action programs but that a high degree of competence and experience is required, plus readiness on the part of the client. He suggests that effective and ineffective ventures need to be monitored more accurately and observations shared as a way to build more stable and reliable guides to effective social intervention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper reviews the efforts of a group of human relations trainers, varying widely in experience, who volunteered to help conduct a training conference for civil rights workers and volunteers. The experience, described as ineffective, is shared as a model of pitfalls which could be characteristic of training with groups committed to social action where the training function is less clearly defined than in "conventional" training laboratories. The author concludes that laboratory training techniques and values do have relevance for complex social action programs but that a high degree of competence and experience is required, plus readiness on the part of the client. He suggests that effective and ineffective ventures need to be monitored more accurately and observations shared as a way to build more stable and reliable guides to effective social intervention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper reviews the efforts of a group of human relations trainers, varying widely in experience, who volunteered to help conduct a training conference for civil rights workers and volunteers. The experience, described as ineffective, is shared as a model of pitfalls which could be characteristic of training with groups committed to social action where the training function is less clearly defined than in "conventional" training laboratories. The author concludes that laboratory training techniques and values do have relevance for complex social action programs but that a high degree of competence and experience is required, plus readiness on the part of the client. He suggests that effective and ineffective ventures need to be monitored more accurately and observations shared as a way to build more stable and reliable guides to effective social intervention.

Key concepts: Competence (human resources), Psychology, Action (physics), Training (meteorology), Relevance (law), Social psychology, Intervention (counseling), Function (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Human Relations Training and Interracial Social Action: Problems in Self and Client Definition — Research Paper | ScholarLens