1986Investigative RadiologyRequires access

CT Differentiation of Pleural Effusion from Ascites

Robert A. Halvorsen, Peter J. Fedyshin, Melvyn Korobkin, William M. Thompson

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Thompson WM. CT differentiation of pleural effusion from ascites: an evaluation of four signs using blinded analysis of 52 cases. Four criteria have been described to differentiate ascites from pleural effusion by computed tomography (CT). These four signs (the diaphragm sign, the displaced crus sign, the interface sign, and the bare area sign) were compared in a retrospective blinded analysis in 52 patients with ascites, right pleural effusion, or both ascites and right pleural effusion. There were limitations with each of the four criteria. Each of the individual criteria was reliable when only one abnormal fluid collection, either pleural effusion or ascites, was present. When both a right pleural effusion and ascites were present, none of the four criteria reliably identified both fluid collections. The combined use of the four criteria, however, led to a correct identification of all the abnormal fluid collections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Thompson WM. CT differentiation of pleural effusion from ascites: an evaluation of four signs using blinded analysis of 52 cases. Four criteria have been described to differentiate ascites from pleural effusion by computed tomography (CT). These four signs (the diaphragm sign, the displaced crus sign, the interface sign, and the bare area sign) were compared in a retrospective blinded analysis in 52 patients with ascites, right pleural effusion, or both ascites and right pleural effusion. There were limitations with each of the four criteria. Each of the individual criteria was reliable when only one abnormal fluid collection, either pleural effusion or ascites, was present. When both a right pleural effusion and ascites were present, none of the four criteria reliably identified both fluid collections. The combined use of the four criteria, however, led to a correct identification of all the abnormal fluid collections.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Halvorsen RA, Fedyshin PJ, Korobkin M, Thompson WM. CT differentiation of pleural effusion from ascites: an evaluation of four signs using blinded analysis of 52 cases. Four criteria have been described to differentiate ascites from pleural effusion by computed tomography (CT). These four signs (the diaphragm sign, the displaced crus sign, the interface sign, and the bare area sign) were compared in a retrospective blinded analysis in 52 patients with ascites, right pleural effusion, or both ascites and right pleural effusion. There were limitations with each of the four criteria. Each of the individual criteria was reliable when only one abnormal fluid collection, either pleural effusion or ascites, was present. When both a right pleural effusion and ascites were present, none of the four criteria reliably identified both fluid collections. The combined use of the four criteria, however, led to a correct identification of all the abnormal fluid collections.

Key concepts: Ascites, Pleural effusion, Medicine, Effusion, Radiology, Internal medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CT Differentiation of Pleural Effusion from Ascites — Research Paper | ScholarLens