1999Unpublished venueRequires access

Waterflood Strategy, Challenges and Innovations

F. A. Kenawy, O. A. Bibars, H.H. Hanafy, A. S. Rezk

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract More than twenty four years ago, Gupco (Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company) initiated the first waterflood project in Egypt for the giant El Morgan oil field. With continuing waterflooding experience, Gupco has applied this improved recovery method for other fields. Currently Gupco operates 14 different waterflood reservoirs. These reservoirs have produced a cumulative oil representing 40% of their original oil-in-place. On average, the projected waterflood recovery factor is 54% of OOIP. Due to non-uniform lithology and non-uniform pattern of existing well locations in most reservoirs, peripheral waterflood was found to be the most suitable and economic waterflood pattern at project startup. Peripheral waterflooding has the advantage that it minimizes the number of injection wells by converting the watered-out producers. As the Gupco reservoirs become more mature, the line-drive pattern (peripheral + up-dip injection) was found to be more effective. Since most of the Gupco's reservoirs are currently in the mature stage, good managing and close monitoring for each waterflood project is extremely important. This paper presents Gupco strategy in managing the different waterflood projects to maximize both the oil production rate and oil recovery in optimum manners. This is being achieved through several common and familiar waterflood issues including: a) pressure maintenance, b) in-fill drilling, c) zonal injection improvement, d) injection pattern modification, e) injection below formation parting pressure, f) workovers for production and injection wells, g) continuous data collection, and h) water quality monitoring. The paper also shows how Gupco is addressing the waterflood side effects of scale buildup, reservoir souring and facilities corrosion. In addition, the paper discusses some of the innovative techniques that Gupco has used to maximize waterflood recovery and enable waterflooding of marginal fields. Examples for these techniques are gas-cap water barrier injection, heavy oil waterflooding, coiled-tube water injection lines, slim-tube dual completions, and satellite waterflooding for pilot and marginal fields waterflooding.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract More than twenty four years ago, Gupco (Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company) initiated the first waterflood project in Egypt for the giant El Morgan oil field. With continuing waterflooding experience, Gupco has applied this improved recovery method for other fields. Currently Gupco operates 14 different waterflood reservoirs. These reservoirs have produced a cumulative oil representing 40% of their original oil-in-place. On average, the projected waterflood recovery factor is 54% of OOIP. Due to non-uniform lithology and non-uniform pattern of existing well locations in most reservoirs, peripheral waterflood was found to be the most suitable and economic waterflood pattern at project startup. Peripheral waterflooding has the advantage that it minimizes the number of injection wells by converting the watered-out producers. As the Gupco reservoirs become more mature, the line-drive pattern (peripheral + up-dip injection) was found to be more effective. Since most of the Gupco's reservoirs are currently in the mature stage, good managing and close monitoring for each waterflood project is extremely important. This paper presents Gupco strategy in managing the different waterflood projects to maximize both the oil production rate and oil recovery in optimum manners. This is being achieved through several common and familiar waterflood issues including: a) pressure maintenance, b) in-fill drilling, c) zonal injection improvement, d) injection pattern modification, e) injection below formation parting pressure, f) workovers for production and injection wells, g) continuous data collection, and h) water quality monitoring. The paper also shows how Gupco is addressing the waterflood side effects of scale buildup, reservoir souring and facilities corrosion. In addition, the paper discusses some of the innovative techniques that Gupco has used to maximize waterflood recovery and enable waterflooding of marginal fields. Examples for these techniques are gas-cap water barrier injection, heavy oil waterflooding, coiled-tube water injection lines, slim-tube dual completions, and satellite waterflooding for pilot and marginal fields waterflooding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract More than twenty four years ago, Gupco (Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company) initiated the first waterflood project in Egypt for the giant El Morgan oil field. With continuing waterflooding experience, Gupco has applied this improved recovery method for other fields. Currently Gupco operates 14 different waterflood reservoirs. These reservoirs have produced a cumulative oil representing 40% of their original oil-in-place. On average, the projected waterflood recovery factor is 54% of OOIP. Due to non-uniform lithology and non-uniform pattern of existing well locations in most reservoirs, peripheral waterflood was found to be the most suitable and economic waterflood pattern at project startup. Peripheral waterflooding has the advantage that it minimizes the number of injection wells by converting the watered-out producers. As the Gupco reservoirs become more mature, the line-drive pattern (peripheral + up-dip injection) was found to be more effective. Since most of the Gupco's reservoirs are currently in the mature stage, good managing and close monitoring for each waterflood project is extremely important. This paper presents Gupco strategy in managing the different waterflood projects to maximize both the oil production rate and oil recovery in optimum manners. This is being achieved through several common and familiar waterflood issues including: a) pressure maintenance, b) in-fill drilling, c) zonal injection improvement, d) injection pattern modification, e) injection below formation parting pressure, f) workovers for production and injection wells, g) continuous data collection, and h) water quality monitoring. The paper also shows how Gupco is addressing the waterflood side effects of scale buildup, reservoir souring and facilities corrosion. In addition, the paper discusses some of the innovative techniques that Gupco has used to maximize waterflood recovery and enable waterflooding of marginal fields. Examples for these techniques are gas-cap water barrier injection, heavy oil waterflooding, coiled-tube water injection lines, slim-tube dual completions, and satellite waterflooding for pilot and marginal fields waterflooding.

Key concepts: Petroleum engineering, Oil in place, Petroleum, Geology, Well stimulation, Water injection (oil production), Drilling, Oil field

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Waterflood Strategy, Challenges and Innovations — Research Paper | ScholarLens