1996•Seminars in Reproductive MedicineRequires access

The Range of Normal

David L. Olive

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

One of the primary aspects of any test is its capacity to distinguish "normal" from "abnormal." However, the issue of what normal truly is remains complex. There are two categories: correlated normality and isolated normality. Each has numerous advantages and disadvantages, but the latter is much more common for defining normal. The method of establishing limits of normal varies depending on whether correlated or isolated normality is utilized. With correlated normality, the limits are dependent on whether the purpose of the test is discovery, exclusion, or confirmation. Isolated normality limits are frequently based on the consequences of being termed abnormal. It is imperative that normal limits be based on values of an appropriate reference group: the normal group should be healthy equivalents of the individual being tested. Finally, both intrapersonal and menstruational variations that result when multiple tests are performed on the same individual should be accounted for.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One of the primary aspects of any test is its capacity to distinguish "normal" from "abnormal." However, the issue of what normal truly is remains complex. There are two categories: correlated normality and isolated normality. Each has numerous advantages and disadvantages, but the latter is much more common for defining normal. The method of establishing limits of normal varies depending on whether correlated or isolated normality is utilized. With correlated normality, the limits are dependent on whether the purpose of the test is discovery, exclusion, or confirmation. Isolated normality limits are frequently based on the consequences of being termed abnormal. It is imperative that normal limits be based on values of an appropriate reference group: the normal group should be healthy equivalents of the individual being tested. Finally, both intrapersonal and menstruational variations that result when multiple tests are performed on the same individual should be accounted for.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One of the primary aspects of any test is its capacity to distinguish "normal" from "abnormal." However, the issue of what normal truly is remains complex. There are two categories: correlated normality and isolated normality. Each has numerous advantages and disadvantages, but the latter is much more common for defining normal. The method of establishing limits of normal varies depending on whether correlated or isolated normality is utilized. With correlated normality, the limits are dependent on whether the purpose of the test is discovery, exclusion, or confirmation. Isolated normality limits are frequently based on the consequences of being termed abnormal. It is imperative that normal limits be based on values of an appropriate reference group: the normal group should be healthy equivalents of the individual being tested. Finally, both intrapersonal and menstruational variations that result when multiple tests are performed on the same individual should be accounted for.

Key concepts: Normality, Normal group, Normal distribution, Normal values, Intrapersonal communication, Psychology, Statistics, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Range of Normal — Research Paper | ScholarLens