Effects of Scale on the Performance of Whipple Shields for Impact Velocities Ranging from 7 to 10 km/s
Andrew J. Piekutowski, Kevin L. Poormon
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andrew J. Piekutowski, Kevin L. Poormon
Abstract
Open-access reader
The results of 28 hypervelocity impact tests performed using a full-scale and two subscale versions of a simple Whipple shield and aluminum spheres are presented. “Pass/Fail” lines were developed for each subscale shield for impact velocities ranging from 6.90 to 9.77 km/s. These lines were compared to one another and to a scale-appropriate ballistic limit curve generated using Ballistic Limit Equations (BLE) from Christiansen. Both subscale shields exhibited similar performance capabilities when the impact velocity was near 7 km/s. The Christiansen BLE closely described the capability of a 0.46-scale shield but underpredicted the capability of a 0.25-scale shield, which improved when compared to the ballistic limit curve, as the impact velocity was increased. The performance of the full- scale shield was significantly below its predicted capability when the impact velocity was 7 km/s.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The results of 28 hypervelocity impact tests performed using a full-scale and two subscale versions of a simple Whipple shield and aluminum spheres are presented. “Pass/Fail” lines were developed for each subscale shield for impact velocities ranging from 6.90 to 9.77 km/s. These lines were compared to one another and to a scale-appropriate ballistic limit curve generated using Ballistic Limit Equations (BLE) from Christiansen. Both subscale shields exhibited similar performance capabilities when the impact velocity was near 7 km/s. The Christiansen BLE closely described the capability of a 0.46-scale shield but underpredicted the capability of a 0.25-scale shield, which improved when compared to the ballistic limit curve, as the impact velocity was increased. The performance of the full- scale shield was significantly below its predicted capability when the impact velocity was 7 km/s.
Key concepts: Ballistic limit, Shields, Hypervelocity, Shield, Ranging, Scale (ratio), Limit (mathematics), Mechanics