1979•International Journal of Environmental & Analytical ChemistryRequires access

Critical Comparison of Preconcentration Methods for Trace Ion Determination by Energy and Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry

Donald E. Leydens, Wolfhard Wegscheider, William B. Bodnar

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the field of metal ion preconcentration from environmental water samples. The methods most widely used include ion-exchange, precipitation (and coprecipitation), adsorption and chelation with immobilized and non-immobilized reagents. As the mechanisms underlying the various methods are different. it is expected that these methods perform differently with respect to the enrichment factor. sensitivity and recovery of trace metal ions. In this investigation, the preconcentration of 10 cations. Ag, As, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Pb and Zn was studied. The methods of preconcentration include (1) cation-exchange resin-loaded filter paper. (2) precipitation with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, (3) precipitation with ammoniumpyrrolidinedithiocarbamate. (4) chelation with oxine with subsequent adsorption on activated carbon and (5) chelation with diethyldithiocarbamate immobilized on controlled pore glass. Among the factors compared are the detection limits, sensitivity, precision. linearity and dependence of the recovery on the concentration of metal ions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the field of metal ion preconcentration from environmental water samples. The methods most widely used include ion-exchange, precipitation (and coprecipitation), adsorption and chelation with immobilized and non-immobilized reagents. As the mechanisms underlying the various methods are different. it is expected that these methods perform differently with respect to the enrichment factor. sensitivity and recovery of trace metal ions. In this investigation, the preconcentration of 10 cations. Ag, As, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Pb and Zn was studied. The methods of preconcentration include (1) cation-exchange resin-loaded filter paper. (2) precipitation with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, (3) precipitation with ammoniumpyrrolidinedithiocarbamate. (4) chelation with oxine with subsequent adsorption on activated carbon and (5) chelation with diethyldithiocarbamate immobilized on controlled pore glass. Among the factors compared are the detection limits, sensitivity, precision. linearity and dependence of the recovery on the concentration of metal ions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the field of metal ion preconcentration from environmental water samples. The methods most widely used include ion-exchange, precipitation (and coprecipitation), adsorption and chelation with immobilized and non-immobilized reagents. As the mechanisms underlying the various methods are different. it is expected that these methods perform differently with respect to the enrichment factor. sensitivity and recovery of trace metal ions. In this investigation, the preconcentration of 10 cations. Ag, As, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Pb and Zn was studied. The methods of preconcentration include (1) cation-exchange resin-loaded filter paper. (2) precipitation with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate, (3) precipitation with ammoniumpyrrolidinedithiocarbamate. (4) chelation with oxine with subsequent adsorption on activated carbon and (5) chelation with diethyldithiocarbamate immobilized on controlled pore glass. Among the factors compared are the detection limits, sensitivity, precision. linearity and dependence of the recovery on the concentration of metal ions.

Key concepts: Coprecipitation, Chemistry, Adsorption, Metal ions in aqueous solution, Chelation, Precipitation, Reagent, Ion exchange

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Critical Comparison of Preconcentration Methods for Trace Ion Determination by Energy and Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry — Research Paper | ScholarLens