1991•American Review of Respiratory DiseaseRequires access

Comparison of Acridine Orange Stain with Culture and Gram Stain of Needle Aspirate in Experimental Pseudomonas Pneumonia

G. Douglas Campbell, Gerardo S. San Pedro, Margaret A. Bartelt, Robert W. Bradsher, A. Francine Tryka

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of culture, acridine orange stain, and Gram stain were determined using needle aspiration (NA) material obtained from 82 rats with acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and 18 control rats. Lungs were then processed for either bacterial quantitation or histopathologic examination. NA culture proved to be the most sensitive and specific (55 and 100%, respectively). Sensitivity of acridine orange stain was 40%, whereas Gram stain was only 29%. The specificity of each stain was at least 94%. Lung bacterial concentrations influenced the sensitivities of all three techniques, with better sensitivity found in NA samples obtained from lung with bacterial concentration of at least 10(4) colony-forming units (cfu) of P. aeruginosa. Acridine orange and Gram stain results were similar except in NA samples from lung with bacterial concentration of less than 10(4) cfu in which acridine orange stain was more sensitive. The presence of stains identifying bacteria collected from animals with sterile NA culture was found in a small but significant number of samples, suggesting the presence of nonviable though stainable organisms. Use of all three techniques (culture, acridine orange stain, and Gram stain) increased sensitivity to approximately 70% with minimal decrease of specificity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The sensitivity and specificity of culture, acridine orange stain, and Gram stain were determined using needle aspiration (NA) material obtained from 82 rats with acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and 18 control rats. Lungs were then processed for either bacterial quantitation or histopathologic examination. NA culture proved to be the most sensitive and specific (55 and 100%, respectively). Sensitivity of acridine orange stain was 40%, whereas Gram stain was only 29%. The specificity of each stain was at least 94%. Lung bacterial concentrations influenced the sensitivities of all three techniques, with better sensitivity found in NA samples obtained from lung with bacterial concentration of at least 10(4) colony-forming units (cfu) of P. aeruginosa. Acridine orange and Gram stain results were similar except in NA samples from lung with bacterial concentration of less than 10(4) cfu in which acridine orange stain was more sensitive. The presence of stains identifying bacteria collected from animals with sterile NA culture was found in a small but significant number of samples, suggesting the presence of nonviable though stainable organisms. Use of all three techniques (culture, acridine orange stain, and Gram stain) increased sensitivity to approximately 70% with minimal decrease of specificity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of culture, acridine orange stain, and Gram stain were determined using needle aspiration (NA) material obtained from 82 rats with acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and 18 control rats. Lungs were then processed for either bacterial quantitation or histopathologic examination. NA culture proved to be the most sensitive and specific (55 and 100%, respectively). Sensitivity of acridine orange stain was 40%, whereas Gram stain was only 29%. The specificity of each stain was at least 94%. Lung bacterial concentrations influenced the sensitivities of all three techniques, with better sensitivity found in NA samples obtained from lung with bacterial concentration of at least 10(4) colony-forming units (cfu) of P. aeruginosa. Acridine orange and Gram stain results were similar except in NA samples from lung with bacterial concentration of less than 10(4) cfu in which acridine orange stain was more sensitive. The presence of stains identifying bacteria collected from animals with sterile NA culture was found in a small but significant number of samples, suggesting the presence of nonviable though stainable organisms. Use of all three techniques (culture, acridine orange stain, and Gram stain) increased sensitivity to approximately 70% with minimal decrease of specificity.

Key concepts: Acridine orange, Stain, Gram staining, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Microbiology, Staining, Bacteria, Microbiological culture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Acridine Orange Stain with Culture and Gram Stain of Needle Aspirate in Experimental Pseudomonas Pneumonia — Research Paper | ScholarLens