2013•Journal of Private International LawRequires access

Statutory Jurisdiction: An Analysis of the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act

Geneviève Saumier

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The rules governing international jurisdiction in Canada have undergone significant changes over the past twenty years. The Supreme Court of Canada signalled a fundamental shift in the early 1990s with its landmark decisions in Morguard Investments v De Savoye and Hunt v T and N plc, followed one year later with a complete reform of private international law in the Civil Code of Quebec. That same year, the Uniform Law Conference of Canada (ULCC) put forward a model Act offering a statutory regime for court jurisdiction. It took more than ten years, however, for this model Act to make its formal entrance onto the Canadian legal landscape. As of 2013, the model has been adopted by five legislatures in Canada but is in force in only three jurisdictions. The timing for the publication of Black, Pitel and Sobkin's new book on the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (CJPTA) is therefore propitious: it provides a timely and useful guide for those provinces where the new statutory regime already applies as well as a meaningful tool for the remaining jurisdictions that are, or may be, considering following suit.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The rules governing international jurisdiction in Canada have undergone significant changes over the past twenty years. The Supreme Court of Canada signalled a fundamental shift in the early 1990s with its landmark decisions in Morguard Investments v De Savoye and Hunt v T and N plc, followed one year later with a complete reform of private international law in the Civil Code of Quebec. That same year, the Uniform Law Conference of Canada (ULCC) put forward a model Act offering a statutory regime for court jurisdiction. It took more than ten years, however, for this model Act to make its formal entrance onto the Canadian legal landscape. As of 2013, the model has been adopted by five legislatures in Canada but is in force in only three jurisdictions. The timing for the publication of Black, Pitel and Sobkin's new book on the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (CJPTA) is therefore propitious: it provides a timely and useful guide for those provinces where the new statutory regime already applies as well as a meaningful tool for the remaining jurisdictions that are, or may be, considering following suit.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The rules governing international jurisdiction in Canada have undergone significant changes over the past twenty years. The Supreme Court of Canada signalled a fundamental shift in the early 1990s with its landmark decisions in Morguard Investments v De Savoye and Hunt v T and N plc, followed one year later with a complete reform of private international law in the Civil Code of Quebec. That same year, the Uniform Law Conference of Canada (ULCC) put forward a model Act offering a statutory regime for court jurisdiction. It took more than ten years, however, for this model Act to make its formal entrance onto the Canadian legal landscape. As of 2013, the model has been adopted by five legislatures in Canada but is in force in only three jurisdictions. The timing for the publication of Black, Pitel and Sobkin's new book on the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act (CJPTA) is therefore propitious: it provides a timely and useful guide for those provinces where the new statutory regime already applies as well as a meaningful tool for the remaining jurisdictions that are, or may be, considering following suit.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Statutory law, Law, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Exclusive jurisdiction, Political science, Original jurisdiction, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Statutory Jurisdiction: An Analysis of the Court Jurisdiction and Proceedings Transfer Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens