LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
HUBERT WINSTON SMITH
Abstract
HUBERT WINSTON SMITH
Abstract
This study has ranged widely; I shall now narrow its orbit and focus sharply on the American scene. The first of malpractice to be carried to an American court of appeal, so far as I can discover, was that of Cross v. Guthery , decided by the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut 1794 (2 Root 90, 1 Am. Dec. 61). The plaintiff brought an action on the case against the defendant, a practicing physician who professed to be skilled surgery. The plaintiff alleged that his wife had a scrofulous humor one of her breasts which required its removal and that he employed the defendant, who performed the operation in so unskillful and cruel a manner, that the plaintiff's wife survived by but three hours. The plaintiff prayed for damages the sum of £1,000 to cover his costs and expense and to repay him for the
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study has ranged widely; I shall now narrow its orbit and focus sharply on the American scene. The first of malpractice to be carried to an American court of appeal, so far as I can discover, was that of Cross v. Guthery , decided by the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut 1794 (2 Root 90, 1 Am. Dec. 61). The plaintiff brought an action on the case against the defendant, a practicing physician who professed to be skilled surgery. The plaintiff alleged that his wife had a scrofulous humor one of her breasts which required its removal and that he employed the defendant, who performed the operation in so unskillful and cruel a manner, that the plaintiff's wife survived by but three hours. The plaintiff prayed for damages the sum of £1,000 to cover his costs and expense and to repay him for the
Key concepts: Malpractice, Medical malpractice, Business, Legal responsibility, Law, Medicine, Political science