Performance of Jointless Bridges
Amde M. Wolde‐Tinsae, James Klinger, Elmer J. White
Abstract
Amde M. Wolde‐Tinsae, James Klinger, Elmer J. White
Abstract
Over the years, bridge deck expansion joints have performed poorly, resulting in structural distress and other ill effects. In an attempt to remedy this situation, 28 states have constructed long, multiple‐span highway bridges without expansion joints. For this paper, jointless bridges in three states, California, New York, and Tennessee, were inspected to assess their performance. Case studies for bridges in each state are summarized, and problems encountered by the states with bridges of this type are presented and discussed.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Over the years, bridge deck expansion joints have performed poorly, resulting in structural distress and other ill effects. In an attempt to remedy this situation, 28 states have constructed long, multiple‐span highway bridges without expansion joints. For this paper, jointless bridges in three states, California, New York, and Tennessee, were inspected to assess their performance. Case studies for bridges in each state are summarized, and problems encountered by the states with bridges of this type are presented and discussed.
Key concepts: Expansion joint, Deck, Engineering, Bridge (graph theory), Forensic engineering, Structural engineering, Medicine, Internal medicine