Facts and Artefacts in Bone Densitometry
Gopinath Gnanasegaran, Glen M. Blake, F. M. Crane, Dwight Dulnoan, Susan E. Clarke, I Fogelman, Ignac Fogelman
Abstract
Gopinath Gnanasegaran, Glen M. Blake, F. M. Crane, Dwight Dulnoan, Susan E. Clarke, I Fogelman, Ignac Fogelman
Abstract
Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. However, variants and artefacts such as, osteophytes and metallic objects can affect the BMD results of the spine and hip. We demonstrate a spectrum of clinical examples that may impact on BMD evaluation. Recognition of such artefacts is important for the correct interpretation of these studies. Keywords: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), Osteoporosis, Imaging, bone mineral density, scanning
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. However, variants and artefacts such as, osteophytes and metallic objects can affect the BMD results of the spine and hip. We demonstrate a spectrum of clinical examples that may impact on BMD evaluation. Recognition of such artefacts is important for the correct interpretation of these studies. Keywords: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), Osteoporosis, Imaging, bone mineral density, scanning
Key concepts: Densitometry, Bone mineral, Osteoporosis, Dual energy, Medicine, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Radiology, Nuclear medicine