1997Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Rutting Development in Linear Tracking Test Pavements To Evaluate Shell Subgrade Strain Criterion

J Groenendijk, C H Vogelzang, A Miradi, A A A Molenaar, Ljm Dohmen

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Two full-depth gravel asphalt concrete (AC) pavements of 0.15- and 0.08-m thickness on a sand subgrade were loaded with 4 million and 0.65 million repetitions of a 75-kN super-single wheel load using the linear tracking device (LINTRACK), a heavy-traffic simulator. Frequent measurements of asphalt strains, temperatures, rutting, cracking, and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) were made. The data analysis of the rutting measurements indicates that all rutting could be ascribed to subgrade deformation (secondary rutting). No evidence was found of shear deformation within the asphalt layer (primary rutting). The data analysis also indicates that the observed rutting performance of the LINTRACK test sections (to a maximum rut depth of 18 mm) coincides closely with the average criterion from the Shell Pavement Design Manual, which relates subgrade strain to allowable number of strain repetitions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two full-depth gravel asphalt concrete (AC) pavements of 0.15- and 0.08-m thickness on a sand subgrade were loaded with 4 million and 0.65 million repetitions of a 75-kN super-single wheel load using the linear tracking device (LINTRACK), a heavy-traffic simulator. Frequent measurements of asphalt strains, temperatures, rutting, cracking, and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) were made. The data analysis of the rutting measurements indicates that all rutting could be ascribed to subgrade deformation (secondary rutting). No evidence was found of shear deformation within the asphalt layer (primary rutting). The data analysis also indicates that the observed rutting performance of the LINTRACK test sections (to a maximum rut depth of 18 mm) coincides closely with the average criterion from the Shell Pavement Design Manual, which relates subgrade strain to allowable number of strain repetitions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two full-depth gravel asphalt concrete (AC) pavements of 0.15- and 0.08-m thickness on a sand subgrade were loaded with 4 million and 0.65 million repetitions of a 75-kN super-single wheel load using the linear tracking device (LINTRACK), a heavy-traffic simulator. Frequent measurements of asphalt strains, temperatures, rutting, cracking, and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) were made. The data analysis of the rutting measurements indicates that all rutting could be ascribed to subgrade deformation (secondary rutting). No evidence was found of shear deformation within the asphalt layer (primary rutting). The data analysis also indicates that the observed rutting performance of the LINTRACK test sections (to a maximum rut depth of 18 mm) coincides closely with the average criterion from the Shell Pavement Design Manual, which relates subgrade strain to allowable number of strain repetitions.

Key concepts: Rut, Subgrade, Geotechnical engineering, Asphalt, Cracking, Asphalt concrete, Falling weight deflectometer, Deformation (meteorology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rutting Development in Linear Tracking Test Pavements To Evaluate Shell Subgrade Strain Criterion — Research Paper | ScholarLens