1987Journal of Developmental & Behavioral PediatricsRequires access

Behavior as a Diagnostic Aid in Failure-to-Thrive

Gerald F. Powell, Jaclyn F. Low, Marjorie A. Speers

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The presence of a defined set of behaviors was examined in 67 hospitalized infants, 3-24 months old; 17 with organic failure-to-thrive (OFTT), 17 with nonorganic failure-to-thrive (NOFTT), and 33 with no signs of failure-to-thrive. The usefulness of assessing these behaviors to distinguish nonorganic from organic failure-to-thrive infants was evaluated. The frequency of behaviors per infant as well as the intensity of behaviors was greater for NOFTT. The order of decreasing frequency of behaviors was similar in both OFTT and NOFTT infants. Four of the 7 most prevalent behaviors occurred significantly more frequently in NOFTT than OFTT infants. The presence of these behaviors does not rule in NOFTT or rule out OFTT. However, when a number of the behaviors are present, particularly if they occur in high intensity, and when no organic disease is found, a diagnosis of NOFTT is suggested. Response to appropriate treatment remains the most reliable confirmation of the diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The presence of a defined set of behaviors was examined in 67 hospitalized infants, 3-24 months old; 17 with organic failure-to-thrive (OFTT), 17 with nonorganic failure-to-thrive (NOFTT), and 33 with no signs of failure-to-thrive. The usefulness of assessing these behaviors to distinguish nonorganic from organic failure-to-thrive infants was evaluated. The frequency of behaviors per infant as well as the intensity of behaviors was greater for NOFTT. The order of decreasing frequency of behaviors was similar in both OFTT and NOFTT infants. Four of the 7 most prevalent behaviors occurred significantly more frequently in NOFTT than OFTT infants. The presence of these behaviors does not rule in NOFTT or rule out OFTT. However, when a number of the behaviors are present, particularly if they occur in high intensity, and when no organic disease is found, a diagnosis of NOFTT is suggested. Response to appropriate treatment remains the most reliable confirmation of the diagnosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The presence of a defined set of behaviors was examined in 67 hospitalized infants, 3-24 months old; 17 with organic failure-to-thrive (OFTT), 17 with nonorganic failure-to-thrive (NOFTT), and 33 with no signs of failure-to-thrive. The usefulness of assessing these behaviors to distinguish nonorganic from organic failure-to-thrive infants was evaluated. The frequency of behaviors per infant as well as the intensity of behaviors was greater for NOFTT. The order of decreasing frequency of behaviors was similar in both OFTT and NOFTT infants. Four of the 7 most prevalent behaviors occurred significantly more frequently in NOFTT than OFTT infants. The presence of these behaviors does not rule in NOFTT or rule out OFTT. However, when a number of the behaviors are present, particularly if they occur in high intensity, and when no organic disease is found, a diagnosis of NOFTT is suggested. Response to appropriate treatment remains the most reliable confirmation of the diagnosis.

Key concepts: Failure to thrive, Medicine, Pediatrics, Psychology, Developmental psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Behavior as a Diagnostic Aid in Failure-to-Thrive — Research Paper | ScholarLens