1994Psychological ReportsRequires access

Blocking in Pavlovian Conditioning: Effect of Prior Excitatory Conditioning to a Stimulus Extraneous to Compound Conditioning

Paul L. DeVito, Laurie Cashman, Kimberly Christine Petka

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The effect of prior excitatory conditioning to a stimulus not included in the compound conditioning phase of the typical blocking experiment was assessed in three CER studies. The first experiment, in which rat subjects received A+, C+, or a combination of A+/C+ trials prior to AB+ conditioning, showed that A+/C+ or C+ training produced as robust blocking as A+ training relative to a control group with no prior conditioning. A second experiment which was designed to assess the role of background cues in mediating the blocking effect indicated that background cues were not responsible for the A+ or C+ effects, while a third experiment showed these same effects were not mediated by stimulus generalization. The findings of these experiments are interpreted in the context of pseudoconditioning-induced rehearsal of a US representation in short-term memory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of prior excitatory conditioning to a stimulus not included in the compound conditioning phase of the typical blocking experiment was assessed in three CER studies. The first experiment, in which rat subjects received A+, C+, or a combination of A+/C+ trials prior to AB+ conditioning, showed that A+/C+ or C+ training produced as robust blocking as A+ training relative to a control group with no prior conditioning. A second experiment which was designed to assess the role of background cues in mediating the blocking effect indicated that background cues were not responsible for the A+ or C+ effects, while a third experiment showed these same effects were not mediated by stimulus generalization. The findings of these experiments are interpreted in the context of pseudoconditioning-induced rehearsal of a US representation in short-term memory.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of prior excitatory conditioning to a stimulus not included in the compound conditioning phase of the typical blocking experiment was assessed in three CER studies. The first experiment, in which rat subjects received A+, C+, or a combination of A+/C+ trials prior to AB+ conditioning, showed that A+/C+ or C+ training produced as robust blocking as A+ training relative to a control group with no prior conditioning. A second experiment which was designed to assess the role of background cues in mediating the blocking effect indicated that background cues were not responsible for the A+ or C+ effects, while a third experiment showed these same effects were not mediated by stimulus generalization. The findings of these experiments are interpreted in the context of pseudoconditioning-induced rehearsal of a US representation in short-term memory.

Key concepts: Conditioning, Blocking effect, Psychology, Classical conditioning, Measures of conditioned emotional response, Fear conditioning, Excitatory postsynaptic potential, Stimulus (psychology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Blocking in Pavlovian Conditioning: Effect of Prior Excitatory Conditioning to a Stimulus Extraneous to Compound Conditioning — Research Paper | ScholarLens