1984•Communications in Statistics - Simulation and ComputationRequires access

Bayesian analysis of outliers via akaike's predictive likelihood of a model

Genshiro Kitagawa

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

A set of independent observations is assumed to come from one or more normal populations having the same unknown variance and different unknown means. Ignorance priors are associated with these parameters. The number of populations is also unknown as is the number of observations from each, but priors are chosen for these quantities which make it very likely that one population is dominant. Observations from the rest are considered outliers. Using these priors in conjunction with Akaike's predictive likelihood, which is derived for the class of models considered, one can obtain a quasi-Bayesian posterior probability for each possible model. A “robust” estimate of the mean value of the dominant population and “corrected” values for the outliers can be calculated from the posterior probabilities, once the outliers have been designated. Darwin's data and Herndon's data are analyzed to illustrate the procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A set of independent observations is assumed to come from one or more normal populations having the same unknown variance and different unknown means. Ignorance priors are associated with these parameters. The number of populations is also unknown as is the number of observations from each, but priors are chosen for these quantities which make it very likely that one population is dominant. Observations from the rest are considered outliers. Using these priors in conjunction with Akaike's predictive likelihood, which is derived for the class of models considered, one can obtain a quasi-Bayesian posterior probability for each possible model. A “robust” estimate of the mean value of the dominant population and “corrected” values for the outliers can be calculated from the posterior probabilities, once the outliers have been designated. Darwin's data and Herndon's data are analyzed to illustrate the procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A set of independent observations is assumed to come from one or more normal populations having the same unknown variance and different unknown means. Ignorance priors are associated with these parameters. The number of populations is also unknown as is the number of observations from each, but priors are chosen for these quantities which make it very likely that one population is dominant. Observations from the rest are considered outliers. Using these priors in conjunction with Akaike's predictive likelihood, which is derived for the class of models considered, one can obtain a quasi-Bayesian posterior probability for each possible model. A “robust” estimate of the mean value of the dominant population and “corrected” values for the outliers can be calculated from the posterior probabilities, once the outliers have been designated. Darwin's data and Herndon's data are analyzed to illustrate the procedure.

Key concepts: Akaike information criterion, Prior probability, Outlier, Bayesian information criterion, Statistics, Bayesian probability, Mathematics, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bayesian analysis of outliers via akaike's predictive likelihood of a model — Research Paper | ScholarLens