Some Intrinsic Inaccuracies of Thermoluminescent Dosimetry
M. Kartha
Abstract
M. Kartha
Abstract
A majority of the users of thermoluminescent dosemeters employ commercially available TLD readers and phosphors. During 7 yr of experience with thermoluminescent dosimetry the author has observed a few important, but generally overlooked problems which are inherent to the system. The non-uniform heating cycle, the position of the reference light source and the dependence of thermoluminescence on the crystal size of LiF can introduce an error oμ up to a maximum of 30% in the dose measurements with TLD-100. Most of this inaccuracy can be eliminated by using careful techniques and simple modifications in the design of the reader.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A majority of the users of thermoluminescent dosemeters employ commercially available TLD readers and phosphors. During 7 yr of experience with thermoluminescent dosimetry the author has observed a few important, but generally overlooked problems which are inherent to the system. The non-uniform heating cycle, the position of the reference light source and the dependence of thermoluminescence on the crystal size of LiF can introduce an error oμ up to a maximum of 30% in the dose measurements with TLD-100. Most of this inaccuracy can be eliminated by using careful techniques and simple modifications in the design of the reader.
Key concepts: Thermoluminescence, Thermoluminescent dosimeter, Thermoluminescent Dosimetry, Dosimetry, Phosphor, Medical physics, Materials science, Nuclear medicine