Reevaluation of Gulf Coast Pliocene-Pleistocene Boundary: ABSTRACT
C. Wylie Poag
Abstract
C. Wylie Poag
Abstract
A reexamination of the sequences of planktonic foram and calcareous nannoplankton in the Plio-Pleistocene sediments beneath the Louisiana continental shelf has been undertaken to modernize correlation schemes that were established 10-20 years ago. As a consequence it can be shown that (1) a new correlation of marine micropaleontological and continental glacial events is necessary; (2) the Gulf Coast faunal events can be correlated reliably with those in the type Italian Pleistocene section and in the deep sea cores; (3) some species, the limits of whose ranges have been relied upon for isochronous boundaries (e.g., Globoquadrina altispira) appear to have persisted in some areas for a considerably longer time than in other areas; and (4) it is increasingly evident that it s invalid to correlate the Plio-Pleistocene boundary, as defined by paleontology, with a climatically defined boundary. End_of_Article - Last_Page 1698------------
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A reexamination of the sequences of planktonic foram and calcareous nannoplankton in the Plio-Pleistocene sediments beneath the Louisiana continental shelf has been undertaken to modernize correlation schemes that were established 10-20 years ago. As a consequence it can be shown that (1) a new correlation of marine micropaleontological and continental glacial events is necessary; (2) the Gulf Coast faunal events can be correlated reliably with those in the type Italian Pleistocene section and in the deep sea cores; (3) some species, the limits of whose ranges have been relied upon for isochronous boundaries (e.g., Globoquadrina altispira) appear to have persisted in some areas for a considerably longer time than in other areas; and (4) it is increasingly evident that it s invalid to correlate the Plio-Pleistocene boundary, as defined by paleontology, with a climatically defined boundary. End_of_Article - Last_Page 1698------------
Key concepts: Geology, Pleistocene, Boundary (topology), Paleontology, Oceanography, Mathematical analysis, Mathematics