2011All DaysRequires access

Comparison and Limitation Analysis of Approaches for Porosity Evaluation from NMR and Three Porosity Logs in Low Permeability Gas Sands with Bad Borehole

Wen Tang, Xu Rui, Zhi Ling-ling, Xiaogang Wang

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we compare four methods of calculating reservoir porosity in low permeability gas sandstones with bad borehole condition, they are neutron-density crossplot technology, DMR technology, piecewise scale methods from acoustic time logging and SMR technology. The principle and limitation of these methods are analysised. When the borehole condition is good, these four technologies are all available, but in the wells with bad borehole, the technology of calculating reservoir porosity by integrating interval transit time logging and NMR logging, the neutron-density crossplot are recommended. For the NMR data acquired from CMR tool, the NMR porosity must be calibrated from deep lateral resistivity or deep induction resistivity logging, but these technologies are still the most useful because the computation process are simple and the odd error is less than DMR technology. The piecewise scale methods is also not recommended because it will spend too much time for log analysts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In this paper, we compare four methods of calculating reservoir porosity in low permeability gas sandstones with bad borehole condition, they are neutron-density crossplot technology, DMR technology, piecewise scale methods from acoustic time logging and SMR technology. The principle and limitation of these methods are analysised. When the borehole condition is good, these four technologies are all available, but in the wells with bad borehole, the technology of calculating reservoir porosity by integrating interval transit time logging and NMR logging, the neutron-density crossplot are recommended. For the NMR data acquired from CMR tool, the NMR porosity must be calibrated from deep lateral resistivity or deep induction resistivity logging, but these technologies are still the most useful because the computation process are simple and the odd error is less than DMR technology. The piecewise scale methods is also not recommended because it will spend too much time for log analysts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In this paper, we compare four methods of calculating reservoir porosity in low permeability gas sandstones with bad borehole condition, they are neutron-density crossplot technology, DMR technology, piecewise scale methods from acoustic time logging and SMR technology. The principle and limitation of these methods are analysised. When the borehole condition is good, these four technologies are all available, but in the wells with bad borehole, the technology of calculating reservoir porosity by integrating interval transit time logging and NMR logging, the neutron-density crossplot are recommended. For the NMR data acquired from CMR tool, the NMR porosity must be calibrated from deep lateral resistivity or deep induction resistivity logging, but these technologies are still the most useful because the computation process are simple and the odd error is less than DMR technology. The piecewise scale methods is also not recommended because it will spend too much time for log analysts.

Key concepts: Borehole, Porosity, Well logging, Permeability (electromagnetism), Sonic logging, Geology, Piecewise, Logging

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison and Limitation Analysis of Approaches for Porosity Evaluation from NMR and Three Porosity Logs in Low Permeability Gas Sands with Bad Borehole — Research Paper | ScholarLens