2008Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and PhenomenaRequires access

Resist charging effect in photomask: Its impact on pattern placement error and critical dimension

Jin Choi, Dong Seok Nam, Byung Gook Kim, Sang-Gyun Woo, Han Ku Cho

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

By the development of the double exposure technique or the double patterning technique, the pattern placement error of a photomask is interesting because of its impact on the size and position of wafer pattern. Among various sources to induce the pattern placement error, we have focused on the charging effect of the FEP-171 resist and have shown that the resist charging effect generates the pattern position error of a clear pattern and the critical dimension variation of a dark pattern. Based on experiment and simulation, we present quantitatively the dependence of position error on pattern density, pattern shape, and writing order. Furthermore, we have discussed the model to describe the charging effect and its agreement with experiment and the correction method to remove the resist charging effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By the development of the double exposure technique or the double patterning technique, the pattern placement error of a photomask is interesting because of its impact on the size and position of wafer pattern. Among various sources to induce the pattern placement error, we have focused on the charging effect of the FEP-171 resist and have shown that the resist charging effect generates the pattern position error of a clear pattern and the critical dimension variation of a dark pattern. Based on experiment and simulation, we present quantitatively the dependence of position error on pattern density, pattern shape, and writing order. Furthermore, we have discussed the model to describe the charging effect and its agreement with experiment and the correction method to remove the resist charging effect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By the development of the double exposure technique or the double patterning technique, the pattern placement error of a photomask is interesting because of its impact on the size and position of wafer pattern. Among various sources to induce the pattern placement error, we have focused on the charging effect of the FEP-171 resist and have shown that the resist charging effect generates the pattern position error of a clear pattern and the critical dimension variation of a dark pattern. Based on experiment and simulation, we present quantitatively the dependence of position error on pattern density, pattern shape, and writing order. Furthermore, we have discussed the model to describe the charging effect and its agreement with experiment and the correction method to remove the resist charging effect.

Key concepts: Photomask, Resist, Critical dimension, Wafer, Position (finance), Dimension (graph theory), Optical proximity correction, Photolithography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Resist charging effect in photomask: Its impact on pattern placement error and critical dimension — Research Paper | ScholarLens