1991•Journal of the Science of Food and AgricultureRequires access

Dissolution of various sources of gypsum in aqueous solutions and in soil

Nanthi Sirangie Bolan, J. Keith Syers, Malcolm E. Sumner

Open publisher page 56 citations

Abstract

Abstract The dissolution of six sources of gypsum in water and 0.01 M CaCl 2 was examined in the presence and absence of soil. The gypsum samples included: analytical grade (AR), three sources of flue‐gas desulphurisation (FGD) gypsum, phosphogypsum (PG), and mined gypsum (MG). Dissolution in aqueous solutions was monitored by measuring the concentration of calcium (Ca 2+ ) and sulphate (SO ) ions. In soils which adsorb small amounts of SO −2 4 , dissolution was estimated from the increase in the concentration of Ca 2+ and SO in gypsum‐treated soil over the control soil. However, in soils which adsorb significant amounts of SO , measurement of solution SO concentration underestimates the extent of dissolution. Gypsum dissolution was larger in water (15.20 mmol litre −1 ) than in 0.01 M CaCl 2 (11.12 mmol litre −1 ), and this was attributed to the Ca 2+ common‐ion effect. The rate of dissolution decreased in the order: AR > FGD > PG > MG. Dissolution was 2 to 10 times faster for powdered (< 500 .m) gypsum than for the discs obtained by pelletising. The differences in the rate of dissolution between the gypsum sources and between powder and disc samples were related to both surface area and the presence of CaCO 3 , impurity. The rate of dissolution was 3 to 8 times faster in the presence than in the absence of soil. Whereas the dissolution of gypsum in the presence of soil followed first order reaction kinetics, it followed second order kinetics in the absence of soil. This difference in reaction kinetics resulted from the continuous removal of Ca2+ and SO by the soil.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The dissolution of six sources of gypsum in water and 0.01 M CaCl 2 was examined in the presence and absence of soil. The gypsum samples included: analytical grade (AR), three sources of flue‐gas desulphurisation (FGD) gypsum, phosphogypsum (PG), and mined gypsum (MG). Dissolution in aqueous solutions was monitored by measuring the concentration of calcium (Ca 2+ ) and sulphate (SO ) ions. In soils which adsorb small amounts of SO −2 4 , dissolution was estimated from the increase in the concentration of Ca 2+ and SO in gypsum‐treated soil over the control soil. However, in soils which adsorb significant amounts of SO , measurement of solution SO concentration underestimates the extent of dissolution. Gypsum dissolution was larger in water (15.20 mmol litre −1 ) than in 0.01 M CaCl 2 (11.12 mmol litre −1 ), and this was attributed to the Ca 2+ common‐ion effect. The rate of dissolution decreased in the order: AR > FGD > PG > MG. Dissolution was 2 to 10 times faster for powdered (< 500 .m) gypsum than for the discs obtained by pelletising. The differences in the rate of dissolution between the gypsum sources and between powder and disc samples were related to both surface area and the presence of CaCO 3 , impurity. The rate of dissolution was 3 to 8 times faster in the presence than in the absence of soil. Whereas the dissolution of gypsum in the presence of soil followed first order reaction kinetics, it followed second order kinetics in the absence of soil. This difference in reaction kinetics resulted from the continuous removal of Ca2+ and SO by the soil.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 56 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The dissolution of six sources of gypsum in water and 0.01 M CaCl 2 was examined in the presence and absence of soil. The gypsum samples included: analytical grade (AR), three sources of flue‐gas desulphurisation (FGD) gypsum, phosphogypsum (PG), and mined gypsum (MG). Dissolution in aqueous solutions was monitored by measuring the concentration of calcium (Ca 2+ ) and sulphate (SO ) ions. In soils which adsorb small amounts of SO −2 4 , dissolution was estimated from the increase in the concentration of Ca 2+ and SO in gypsum‐treated soil over the control soil. However, in soils which adsorb significant amounts of SO , measurement of solution SO concentration underestimates the extent of dissolution. Gypsum dissolution was larger in water (15.20 mmol litre −1 ) than in 0.01 M CaCl 2 (11.12 mmol litre −1 ), and this was attributed to the Ca 2+ common‐ion effect. The rate of dissolution decreased in the order: AR > FGD > PG > MG. Dissolution was 2 to 10 times faster for powdered (< 500 .m) gypsum than for the discs obtained by pelletising. The differences in the rate of dissolution between the gypsum sources and between powder and disc samples were related to both surface area and the presence of CaCO 3 , impurity. The rate of dissolution was 3 to 8 times faster in the presence than in the absence of soil. Whereas the dissolution of gypsum in the presence of soil followed first order reaction kinetics, it followed second order kinetics in the absence of soil. This difference in reaction kinetics resulted from the continuous removal of Ca2+ and SO by the soil.

Key concepts: Dissolution, Gypsum, Chemistry, Soil water, Aqueous solution, Adsorption, Mineralogy, Environmental chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dissolution of various sources of gypsum in aqueous solutions and in soil — Research Paper | ScholarLens