The concept of risk and behaviour models in traffic psychology
R D Huguenin
Abstract
R D Huguenin
Abstract
There are only a few theories which can be used as a basis for research and practice in traffic psychology. Accident proneness has long been considered antiquated. Risk homeostasis is also problematic and, at best, applicable to a very limited domain. Although the analysis of road traffic by system theory is to be welcomed, attention should be drawn to the fact that this hardly permits conclusions about driver behaviour in the actual traffic situation. Prognosis based on theories of general psychology is also only restrictedly possible. Theories of learning explain the formation processes of behaviour in traffic, but are not qualified to predict specific actions which take place in spite of and contrary to learned behaviour patterns. Other models could be considered, but they can only explain certain aspects (i.e. perception, motivation, social aspects). A comprehensive theoretical concept in traffic psychology is therefore necessary. Driving in the actual traffic situationshould be the main issue of such a concept. Predispositions and determinants of actionshould also be included as relevant components. Based on these three observance levels, a theory of action could be defined which would take more account of the characteristics of driving and which would include the concept of risk.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There are only a few theories which can be used as a basis for research and practice in traffic psychology. Accident proneness has long been considered antiquated. Risk homeostasis is also problematic and, at best, applicable to a very limited domain. Although the analysis of road traffic by system theory is to be welcomed, attention should be drawn to the fact that this hardly permits conclusions about driver behaviour in the actual traffic situation. Prognosis based on theories of general psychology is also only restrictedly possible. Theories of learning explain the formation processes of behaviour in traffic, but are not qualified to predict specific actions which take place in spite of and contrary to learned behaviour patterns. Other models could be considered, but they can only explain certain aspects (i.e. perception, motivation, social aspects). A comprehensive theoretical concept in traffic psychology is therefore necessary. Driving in the actual traffic situationshould be the main issue of such a concept. Predispositions and determinants of actionshould also be included as relevant components. Based on these three observance levels, a theory of action could be defined which would take more account of the characteristics of driving and which would include the concept of risk.
Key concepts: Traffic psychology, Action (physics), Perception, Psychology, Domain (mathematical analysis), Risk perception, Accident-proneness, Risk analysis (engineering)