1988ReproductionOpen access

Comparison of zona cutting and zona drilling as techniques for assisted fertilization in the mouse

Herman Depypere, K. John McLaughlin, R.F. Seamark, G. M. Warnes, C.D. Matthews

Open full text 47 citations

Abstract

Zona cutting and zona drilling of the mouse oocyte significantly increased the fertilization rate (3.8-90%) at low sperm concentrations (less than 200,000/ml) compared with zona-intact controls (0-45%). More oocytes were fertilized after zona drilling. Zona cutting was associated with a low loss of oocytes (less than 1%), no increase in polyspermy and normal development in vitro and in vivo after fertilization. There was a 4% oocyte loss rate after zona drilling, mostly due to extrusion of the oocyte from the zona during the procedure. Hatching of blastocysts occurred about 12 h earlier for zona-drilled than for zona-cut and zona-intact control oocytes. Zona drilling was associated with a higher, but not statistically significant, rate of polyspermy at all sperm concentrations tested. The proportion of zygotes developing to the blastocyst stage was not different between the techniques (zona cut, 77%; zona drilled, 66%; control, 71%). Similarly, no difference was found in the percentage of embryos implanting after blastocyst transfer to the uterine horns of pseudopregnant female mice (zona cut, 67%; zona drilled, 68%; control, 77%). Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated the induced defects in the zona with no damage to the oocyte or oolemma. Parthenogenetic activation was not seen after either of the micromanipulative techniques. Both techniques have promise for application to the human.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Zona cutting and zona drilling of the mouse oocyte significantly increased the fertilization rate (3.8-90%) at low sperm concentrations (less than 200,000/ml) compared with zona-intact controls (0-45%). More oocytes were fertilized after zona drilling. Zona cutting was associated with a low loss of oocytes (less than 1%), no increase in polyspermy and normal development in vitro and in vivo after fertilization. There was a 4% oocyte loss rate after zona drilling, mostly due to extrusion of the oocyte from the zona during the procedure. Hatching of blastocysts occurred about 12 h earlier for zona-drilled than for zona-cut and zona-intact control oocytes. Zona drilling was associated with a higher, but not statistically significant, rate of polyspermy at all sperm concentrations tested. The proportion of zygotes developing to the blastocyst stage was not different between the techniques (zona cut, 77%; zona drilled, 66%; control, 71%). Similarly, no difference was found in the percentage of embryos implanting after blastocyst transfer to the uterine horns of pseudopregnant female mice (zona cut, 67%; zona drilled, 68%; control, 77%). Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated the induced defects in the zona with no damage to the oocyte or oolemma. Parthenogenetic activation was not seen after either of the micromanipulative techniques. Both techniques have promise for application to the human.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Zona cutting and zona drilling of the mouse oocyte significantly increased the fertilization rate (3.8-90%) at low sperm concentrations (less than 200,000/ml) compared with zona-intact controls (0-45%). More oocytes were fertilized after zona drilling. Zona cutting was associated with a low loss of oocytes (less than 1%), no increase in polyspermy and normal development in vitro and in vivo after fertilization. There was a 4% oocyte loss rate after zona drilling, mostly due to extrusion of the oocyte from the zona during the procedure. Hatching of blastocysts occurred about 12 h earlier for zona-drilled than for zona-cut and zona-intact control oocytes. Zona drilling was associated with a higher, but not statistically significant, rate of polyspermy at all sperm concentrations tested. The proportion of zygotes developing to the blastocyst stage was not different between the techniques (zona cut, 77%; zona drilled, 66%; control, 71%). Similarly, no difference was found in the percentage of embryos implanting after blastocyst transfer to the uterine horns of pseudopregnant female mice (zona cut, 67%; zona drilled, 68%; control, 77%). Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated the induced defects in the zona with no damage to the oocyte or oolemma. Parthenogenetic activation was not seen after either of the micromanipulative techniques. Both techniques have promise for application to the human.

Key concepts: Zona, Zona pellucida, Polyspermy, Human fertilization, Oocyte, Andrology, Blastocyst, Sperm

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of zona cutting and zona drilling as techniques for assisted fertilization in the mouse — Research Paper | ScholarLens