2004RespirologyRequires access

The relative survival of COPD patients on long‐term oxygen therapy in Australia: A comparative study

Josephine M Cranston, Anh Minh Nguyen, Alan Crockett

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The survival of patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been studied using both univariate and multivariate procedures. There has been only one previous report of relative survival. Relative survival takes into account the risk of death due to increasing age. The objective of this study was to determine the relative survival of a group of South Australian patients prescribed home oxygen therapy for COPD. METHODOLOGY: A method proposed by Hakulinen was used to determine relative survival. The results were compared with the relative survival of a similar group of French COPD patients. RESULTS: A total of 505 COPD patients (249 males, 256 females) were included in the survival analysis. Relative survival corrected for life expectancy was 78.1%, 56.7%, 23.1% and 1.1% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years, respectively, which was less than that reported in a recent French study of comparable patients. Our patients were similar with respect to age, severity of hypoxaemia and oxygen usage to those in the French study. CONCLUSIONS: Using relative survival analysis, Australian LTOT patients with COPD have worse outcomes than some European patients. Factors contributing to the excess mortality in South Australian COPD patients need to be investigated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The survival of patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been studied using both univariate and multivariate procedures. There has been only one previous report of relative survival. Relative survival takes into account the risk of death due to increasing age. The objective of this study was to determine the relative survival of a group of South Australian patients prescribed home oxygen therapy for COPD. METHODOLOGY: A method proposed by Hakulinen was used to determine relative survival. The results were compared with the relative survival of a similar group of French COPD patients. RESULTS: A total of 505 COPD patients (249 males, 256 females) were included in the survival analysis. Relative survival corrected for life expectancy was 78.1%, 56.7%, 23.1% and 1.1% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years, respectively, which was less than that reported in a recent French study of comparable patients. Our patients were similar with respect to age, severity of hypoxaemia and oxygen usage to those in the French study. CONCLUSIONS: Using relative survival analysis, Australian LTOT patients with COPD have worse outcomes than some European patients. Factors contributing to the excess mortality in South Australian COPD patients need to be investigated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The survival of patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has been studied using both univariate and multivariate procedures. There has been only one previous report of relative survival. Relative survival takes into account the risk of death due to increasing age. The objective of this study was to determine the relative survival of a group of South Australian patients prescribed home oxygen therapy for COPD. METHODOLOGY: A method proposed by Hakulinen was used to determine relative survival. The results were compared with the relative survival of a similar group of French COPD patients. RESULTS: A total of 505 COPD patients (249 males, 256 females) were included in the survival analysis. Relative survival corrected for life expectancy was 78.1%, 56.7%, 23.1% and 1.1% at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years, respectively, which was less than that reported in a recent French study of comparable patients. Our patients were similar with respect to age, severity of hypoxaemia and oxygen usage to those in the French study. CONCLUSIONS: Using relative survival analysis, Australian LTOT patients with COPD have worse outcomes than some European patients. Factors contributing to the excess mortality in South Australian COPD patients need to be investigated.

Key concepts: Medicine, COPD, Relative survival, Relative risk, Oxygen therapy, Survival analysis, Life expectancy, Multivariate analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The relative survival of COPD patients on long‐term oxygen therapy in Australia: A comparative study — Research Paper | ScholarLens