Masculinity, Femininity and Androgyny: Their Relations With Multiple Dimensions of Self-Concept
Herbert W. Marsh
Abstract
Herbert W. Marsh
Abstract
Masculinity (M) and femininity (F) were related to multiple dimensions of self-concept in responses from 962 high school students. Androgyny theory predicts that both M and F will contribute positively and uniquely to self-concept, but previous research, typically relying on undifferentiated self-concept measures, has found the unique contribution of F to be nil. In contrast the present investigation found that M and F each contributed positively and uniquely to the prediction of well differentiated facets of self-concept. Consistent with a new model to explain MF/self-concept relations, the differentiated additive model, the relative contribution of M and F varied substantially depending on the area of self-concept; F contributed more positively to the self-concept facets for which girls had higher self-concepts than boys, and in some areas the contribution of F was more positive than the contribution of M. Contrary to predictions for interactive androgyny models and the sex-typed model, M-by-F interactions were not significant, and the effects of M, F and M-by-F did not depend on gender. The social desirability of MF items, whether they were negatively or positively valued, was more highly correlated with the self-concept responses than whether the items were M or F.
OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Masculinity (M) and femininity (F) were related to multiple dimensions of self-concept in responses from 962 high school students. Androgyny theory predicts that both M and F will contribute positively and uniquely to self-concept, but previous research, typically relying on undifferentiated self-concept measures, has found the unique contribution of F to be nil. In contrast the present investigation found that M and F each contributed positively and uniquely to the prediction of well differentiated facets of self-concept. Consistent with a new model to explain MF/self-concept relations, the differentiated additive model, the relative contribution of M and F varied substantially depending on the area of self-concept; F contributed more positively to the self-concept facets for which girls had higher self-concepts than boys, and in some areas the contribution of F was more positive than the contribution of M. Contrary to predictions for interactive androgyny models and the sex-typed model, M-by-F interactions were not significant, and the effects of M, F and M-by-F did not depend on gender. The social desirability of MF items, whether they were negatively or positively valued, was more highly correlated with the self-concept responses than whether the items were M or F.
Key concepts: Androgyny, Femininity, Masculinity, Psychology, Self-concept, Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Psychoanalysis