1987Multivariate Behavioral ResearchRequires access

Masculinity, Femininity and Androgyny: Their Relations With Multiple Dimensions of Self-Concept

Herbert W. Marsh

Open publisher page 52 citations

Abstract

Masculinity (M) and femininity (F) were related to multiple dimensions of self-concept in responses from 962 high school students. Androgyny theory predicts that both M and F will contribute positively and uniquely to self-concept, but previous research, typically relying on undifferentiated self-concept measures, has found the unique contribution of F to be nil. In contrast the present investigation found that M and F each contributed positively and uniquely to the prediction of well differentiated facets of self-concept. Consistent with a new model to explain MF/self-concept relations, the differentiated additive model, the relative contribution of M and F varied substantially depending on the area of self-concept; F contributed more positively to the self-concept facets for which girls had higher self-concepts than boys, and in some areas the contribution of F was more positive than the contribution of M. Contrary to predictions for interactive androgyny models and the sex-typed model, M-by-F interactions were not significant, and the effects of M, F and M-by-F did not depend on gender. The social desirability of MF items, whether they were negatively or positively valued, was more highly correlated with the self-concept responses than whether the items were M or F.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Masculinity (M) and femininity (F) were related to multiple dimensions of self-concept in responses from 962 high school students. Androgyny theory predicts that both M and F will contribute positively and uniquely to self-concept, but previous research, typically relying on undifferentiated self-concept measures, has found the unique contribution of F to be nil. In contrast the present investigation found that M and F each contributed positively and uniquely to the prediction of well differentiated facets of self-concept. Consistent with a new model to explain MF/self-concept relations, the differentiated additive model, the relative contribution of M and F varied substantially depending on the area of self-concept; F contributed more positively to the self-concept facets for which girls had higher self-concepts than boys, and in some areas the contribution of F was more positive than the contribution of M. Contrary to predictions for interactive androgyny models and the sex-typed model, M-by-F interactions were not significant, and the effects of M, F and M-by-F did not depend on gender. The social desirability of MF items, whether they were negatively or positively valued, was more highly correlated with the self-concept responses than whether the items were M or F.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Masculinity (M) and femininity (F) were related to multiple dimensions of self-concept in responses from 962 high school students. Androgyny theory predicts that both M and F will contribute positively and uniquely to self-concept, but previous research, typically relying on undifferentiated self-concept measures, has found the unique contribution of F to be nil. In contrast the present investigation found that M and F each contributed positively and uniquely to the prediction of well differentiated facets of self-concept. Consistent with a new model to explain MF/self-concept relations, the differentiated additive model, the relative contribution of M and F varied substantially depending on the area of self-concept; F contributed more positively to the self-concept facets for which girls had higher self-concepts than boys, and in some areas the contribution of F was more positive than the contribution of M. Contrary to predictions for interactive androgyny models and the sex-typed model, M-by-F interactions were not significant, and the effects of M, F and M-by-F did not depend on gender. The social desirability of MF items, whether they were negatively or positively valued, was more highly correlated with the self-concept responses than whether the items were M or F.

Key concepts: Androgyny, Femininity, Masculinity, Psychology, Self-concept, Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Psychoanalysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Masculinity, Femininity and Androgyny: Their Relations With Multiple Dimensions of Self-Concept — Research Paper | ScholarLens