Effect of Sperm Preparation Techniques by Density Gradient on Intra-Individual Variation of Sperm Motility
Ahmad Hammoud, Mark Gibson, C. Matthew Peterson, Douglas T. Carrell
Abstract
Ahmad Hammoud, Mark Gibson, C. Matthew Peterson, Douglas T. Carrell
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sperm preparation by density gradient on the intra-individual variation in sperm motility. Patients presenting for density gradient (DG) sperm preparation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had more than one preparation were included. The variation within each patient was studied using the coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean x 100). Density gradient preparation resulted in a reduction in the CV of sperm motility (CV motility before DG: 19.8 +/- 15.82% vs. CV motility after DG: 15.9 +/- 17.97%, p < 0.001). However, CV of sperm concentration (44.2 +/- 26.51%) and CV progressively motile sperm (49.2 +/- 28.48%) remained very high after DG. This variability should be reflected in counseling patients undergoing intrauterine insemination.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sperm preparation by density gradient on the intra-individual variation in sperm motility. Patients presenting for density gradient (DG) sperm preparation were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had more than one preparation were included. The variation within each patient was studied using the coefficient of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean x 100). Density gradient preparation resulted in a reduction in the CV of sperm motility (CV motility before DG: 19.8 +/- 15.82% vs. CV motility after DG: 15.9 +/- 17.97%, p < 0.001). However, CV of sperm concentration (44.2 +/- 26.51%) and CV progressively motile sperm (49.2 +/- 28.48%) remained very high after DG. This variability should be reflected in counseling patients undergoing intrauterine insemination.
Key concepts: Sperm, Sperm motility, Coefficient of variation, Motility, Density gradient, Intrauterine insemination, Andrology, Artificial insemination