1931Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical SocietyRequires access

The distinction of analcime from leucite in rocks by X-ray methods

F. A. Bannister

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Since W. Lindgren first detected the presence of microphenocrysts of analcime in basalt, many observers have recorded this mineral as a constituent of igneous rocks, but there is some difficulty in distinguishing between analcime and glass and between analcime and leucite in thin rock-sections. For instance, H. Rosenbusch identified the interstitial colourless isotropic material in monchiquites as glass, whereas L. V. Pirsson showed it to be analcime. H.S. Washington showed that basalts from Sardinia, previously thought to be leueitic, contain phenocrysts of analcime. A. Lacroix also found, in his study of north African basaltic lavas, that in many cases so-called leucite-lavas actually contain analcime and not leucite.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since W. Lindgren first detected the presence of microphenocrysts of analcime in basalt, many observers have recorded this mineral as a constituent of igneous rocks, but there is some difficulty in distinguishing between analcime and glass and between analcime and leucite in thin rock-sections. For instance, H. Rosenbusch identified the interstitial colourless isotropic material in monchiquites as glass, whereas L. V. Pirsson showed it to be analcime. H.S. Washington showed that basalts from Sardinia, previously thought to be leueitic, contain phenocrysts of analcime. A. Lacroix also found, in his study of north African basaltic lavas, that in many cases so-called leucite-lavas actually contain analcime and not leucite.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since W. Lindgren first detected the presence of microphenocrysts of analcime in basalt, many observers have recorded this mineral as a constituent of igneous rocks, but there is some difficulty in distinguishing between analcime and glass and between analcime and leucite in thin rock-sections. For instance, H. Rosenbusch identified the interstitial colourless isotropic material in monchiquites as glass, whereas L. V. Pirsson showed it to be analcime. H.S. Washington showed that basalts from Sardinia, previously thought to be leueitic, contain phenocrysts of analcime. A. Lacroix also found, in his study of north African basaltic lavas, that in many cases so-called leucite-lavas actually contain analcime and not leucite.

Key concepts: Analcime, Leucite, Phenocryst, Geology, Geochemistry, Basalt, Mineral, Igneous rock

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The distinction of analcime from leucite in rocks by X-ray methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens