1984•Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyRequires access

Treatment of acute urinary infection by norfloxacin or nalidixic acid/citrate: a multi-centre comparative study

David S. Reeves, RICHARD W. LACEY, R V Mummery, Mahendra Kumar M, A. J. Bint, S.W.B. Newsom

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

The efficacy, tolerability and side effects of a 3-day treatment for acute urinary infection in general practice with norfloxacin (400 mg 12 hourly) or nalidixic acid/citrate (1 sachet 8 hourly) were compared in a randomized study. Patient groups had similar demography, symptomatology and initial infecting bacteria. Of the evaluable 55 patients in each treatment group with initial bacteriuria, 53 (96%) had no bacteriuria at immediate follow-up after treatment with norfloxacin and 45 (82%) with nalidixic acid/citrate. The corresponding rates at late follow-up were 40/45 (89%) and 29/43 (67%) (P less than 0.05). Among the bacteriuric patients a significantly greater proportion were recorded as having cured and improved symptoms. The tolerability of norfloxacin seemed to be better than that of nalidixic acid/citrate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy, tolerability and side effects of a 3-day treatment for acute urinary infection in general practice with norfloxacin (400 mg 12 hourly) or nalidixic acid/citrate (1 sachet 8 hourly) were compared in a randomized study. Patient groups had similar demography, symptomatology and initial infecting bacteria. Of the evaluable 55 patients in each treatment group with initial bacteriuria, 53 (96%) had no bacteriuria at immediate follow-up after treatment with norfloxacin and 45 (82%) with nalidixic acid/citrate. The corresponding rates at late follow-up were 40/45 (89%) and 29/43 (67%) (P less than 0.05). Among the bacteriuric patients a significantly greater proportion were recorded as having cured and improved symptoms. The tolerability of norfloxacin seemed to be better than that of nalidixic acid/citrate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy, tolerability and side effects of a 3-day treatment for acute urinary infection in general practice with norfloxacin (400 mg 12 hourly) or nalidixic acid/citrate (1 sachet 8 hourly) were compared in a randomized study. Patient groups had similar demography, symptomatology and initial infecting bacteria. Of the evaluable 55 patients in each treatment group with initial bacteriuria, 53 (96%) had no bacteriuria at immediate follow-up after treatment with norfloxacin and 45 (82%) with nalidixic acid/citrate. The corresponding rates at late follow-up were 40/45 (89%) and 29/43 (67%) (P less than 0.05). Among the bacteriuric patients a significantly greater proportion were recorded as having cured and improved symptoms. The tolerability of norfloxacin seemed to be better than that of nalidixic acid/citrate.

Key concepts: Norfloxacin, Nalidixic acid, Library science, Medicine, History, Computer science, Antibiotics, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of acute urinary infection by norfloxacin or nalidixic acid/citrate: a multi-centre comparative study — Research Paper | ScholarLens