2008•The Journal of the Korean Academy of PeriodontologyOpen access

Bone formation following dental implant placement with augmentation materials at dehiscence defects in dogs : pilot study

Ji-Yun Jeong, Joo-Yeon Sohn, Kyung-Jun Chai, Sung-Tae Kim, Sung-Min Chung, In-Seop Lee, Kyoo‐Sung Cho, Chong‐Kwan Kim, Seong‐Ho Choi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Guided bone regeneration(GBR) has emerged as a treatment in the management of osseous defects associated with dental implants. But several studies have reported different degrees of success of guided bone regeneration, depending upon the type of barrier selected, presence or absence of an underlying graft material, types of graft material, feasibility of technique, and clinician's preference. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone formation following dental implant placement with augmentation materials at dehiscence defects in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized buccal dehiscence defects(3x5 mm) were surgically 2 Mongrel dog's mandibles, each 8 SLA surface, 8 anodizing surface implants. Each buccal dehiscence defect received flap surgery only(no treatment, control), Cytoflex(R) membrane only, Resolut XT(R) membrane only, Resolut XT(R)+Osteon(TM). Animals were sacrificed at 8 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. RESULTS: All experimental group resulted in higher bone formation than control. Resolut XT(R)+Osteon(TM) group resulted appeared highest defect resolution. There was no difference between SLA and anodizing surface, nonresorbable and resorbable membrane. CONCLUSION: GBR results in rapid and clinically relevant bone closure on dehiscence defects of the dental implants.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Guided bone regeneration(GBR) has emerged as a treatment in the management of osseous defects associated with dental implants. But several studies have reported different degrees of success of guided bone regeneration, depending upon the type of barrier selected, presence or absence of an underlying graft material, types of graft material, feasibility of technique, and clinician's preference. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone formation following dental implant placement with augmentation materials at dehiscence defects in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized buccal dehiscence defects(3x5 mm) were surgically 2 Mongrel dog's mandibles, each 8 SLA surface, 8 anodizing surface implants. Each buccal dehiscence defect received flap surgery only(no treatment, control), Cytoflex(R) membrane only, Resolut XT(R) membrane only, Resolut XT(R)+Osteon(TM). Animals were sacrificed at 8 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. RESULTS: All experimental group resulted in higher bone formation than control. Resolut XT(R)+Osteon(TM) group resulted appeared highest defect resolution. There was no difference between SLA and anodizing surface, nonresorbable and resorbable membrane. CONCLUSION: GBR results in rapid and clinically relevant bone closure on dehiscence defects of the dental implants.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Guided bone regeneration(GBR) has emerged as a treatment in the management of osseous defects associated with dental implants. But several studies have reported different degrees of success of guided bone regeneration, depending upon the type of barrier selected, presence or absence of an underlying graft material, types of graft material, feasibility of technique, and clinician's preference. The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone formation following dental implant placement with augmentation materials at dehiscence defects in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standardized buccal dehiscence defects(3x5 mm) were surgically 2 Mongrel dog's mandibles, each 8 SLA surface, 8 anodizing surface implants. Each buccal dehiscence defect received flap surgery only(no treatment, control), Cytoflex(R) membrane only, Resolut XT(R) membrane only, Resolut XT(R)+Osteon(TM). Animals were sacrificed at 8 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. RESULTS: All experimental group resulted in higher bone formation than control. Resolut XT(R)+Osteon(TM) group resulted appeared highest defect resolution. There was no difference between SLA and anodizing surface, nonresorbable and resorbable membrane. CONCLUSION: GBR results in rapid and clinically relevant bone closure on dehiscence defects of the dental implants.

Key concepts: Dehiscence, Buccal administration, Dentistry, Medicine, Implant, Dental implant, Osseointegration, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bone formation following dental implant placement with augmentation materials at dehiscence defects in dogs : pilot study — Research Paper | ScholarLens