1988•Journal of Biological RhythmsRequires access

Responses of the Circadian System in the Aplysia Eye to Inhibitors of Protein Synthesis

Sai‐Ching J. Yeung, Arnold Eskin

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Protein synthesis seems to be a general requirement for circadian timing. Defining the time period when inhibition of protein synthesis changes the phase of the biological clock may help identify proteins that are involved in the molecular mechanism of circadian timing. Rothman and Strumwasser (1976), Jacklet (1977), and Lotshaw and Jacklet (1986) gen erated phase response curves (PRCs) for relatively long pulses (6 hr) of anisomycin and puromycin administered to Aplysia eyes. Using somewhat different conditions, we generated a 4-hr anisomycin PRC from Aplysia eyes and found that our anisomycin PRC was similar to that previously described by Lotshaw and Jacklet (1986). We studied recovery of protein synthesis after 1-hr and 6-hr anisomycin treatments and found recovery to be very slow; from 8 to 12 hr appeared to be required for full recovery after anisomycin. Slow recovery occurred when eyes were treated either in buffered artificial seawater or in enriched culture media. Because of the slow recovery after anisomycin, it is difficult to infer accurately from the anisomycin PRC when protein synthesis is important. To identify an inhibitor whose effect reverses quickly, we studied recovery from inhibi tion of protein synthesis after emetine, L-O-methylthreonine, and cycloheximide. Both eme tine and L- O-methylthreonine seemed to reverse no faster than anisomycin, but cycloheximide reversed faster than all the other inhibitors. Cycloheximide (10 mM, 1 hr) produced 89% inhibition of [ 3 H] leucine incorporation, and within 3 hr after removal of cycloheximide, the recovery was 85%. A PRC was obtained using 1-hr treatments of cycloheximide (10 mM). Cycloheximide did not significantly phase-shift from circadian time (CT) 8 to CT 20, and cycloheximide delayed (by about 1 hr or less) the circadian rhythm from CT 20 to CT 8. The cycloheximide PRC was not due to different kinetics of recovery at different phases, as evidenced by similar recovery times when recovery from inhibition by cycloheximide was measured at two phases (a phase when cycloheximide produced no phase shift and a phase when cycloheximide delayed the rhythm).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Protein synthesis seems to be a general requirement for circadian timing. Defining the time period when inhibition of protein synthesis changes the phase of the biological clock may help identify proteins that are involved in the molecular mechanism of circadian timing. Rothman and Strumwasser (1976), Jacklet (1977), and Lotshaw and Jacklet (1986) gen erated phase response curves (PRCs) for relatively long pulses (6 hr) of anisomycin and puromycin administered to Aplysia eyes. Using somewhat different conditions, we generated a 4-hr anisomycin PRC from Aplysia eyes and found that our anisomycin PRC was similar to that previously described by Lotshaw and Jacklet (1986). We studied recovery of protein synthesis after 1-hr and 6-hr anisomycin treatments and found recovery to be very slow; from 8 to 12 hr appeared to be required for full recovery after anisomycin. Slow recovery occurred when eyes were treated either in buffered artificial seawater or in enriched culture media. Because of the slow recovery after anisomycin, it is difficult to infer accurately from the anisomycin PRC when protein synthesis is important. To identify an inhibitor whose effect reverses quickly, we studied recovery from inhibi tion of protein synthesis after emetine, L-O-methylthreonine, and cycloheximide. Both eme tine and L- O-methylthreonine seemed to reverse no faster than anisomycin, but cycloheximide reversed faster than all the other inhibitors. Cycloheximide (10 mM, 1 hr) produced 89% inhibition of [ 3 H] leucine incorporation, and within 3 hr after removal of cycloheximide, the recovery was 85%. A PRC was obtained using 1-hr treatments of cycloheximide (10 mM). Cycloheximide did not significantly phase-shift from circadian time (CT) 8 to CT 20, and cycloheximide delayed (by about 1 hr or less) the circadian rhythm from CT 20 to CT 8. The cycloheximide PRC was not due to different kinetics of recovery at different phases, as evidenced by similar recovery times when recovery from inhibition by cycloheximide was measured at two phases (a phase when cycloheximide produced no phase shift and a phase when cycloheximide delayed the rhythm).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Protein synthesis seems to be a general requirement for circadian timing. Defining the time period when inhibition of protein synthesis changes the phase of the biological clock may help identify proteins that are involved in the molecular mechanism of circadian timing. Rothman and Strumwasser (1976), Jacklet (1977), and Lotshaw and Jacklet (1986) gen erated phase response curves (PRCs) for relatively long pulses (6 hr) of anisomycin and puromycin administered to Aplysia eyes. Using somewhat different conditions, we generated a 4-hr anisomycin PRC from Aplysia eyes and found that our anisomycin PRC was similar to that previously described by Lotshaw and Jacklet (1986). We studied recovery of protein synthesis after 1-hr and 6-hr anisomycin treatments and found recovery to be very slow; from 8 to 12 hr appeared to be required for full recovery after anisomycin. Slow recovery occurred when eyes were treated either in buffered artificial seawater or in enriched culture media. Because of the slow recovery after anisomycin, it is difficult to infer accurately from the anisomycin PRC when protein synthesis is important. To identify an inhibitor whose effect reverses quickly, we studied recovery from inhibi tion of protein synthesis after emetine, L-O-methylthreonine, and cycloheximide. Both eme tine and L- O-methylthreonine seemed to reverse no faster than anisomycin, but cycloheximide reversed faster than all the other inhibitors. Cycloheximide (10 mM, 1 hr) produced 89% inhibition of [ 3 H] leucine incorporation, and within 3 hr after removal of cycloheximide, the recovery was 85%. A PRC was obtained using 1-hr treatments of cycloheximide (10 mM). Cycloheximide did not significantly phase-shift from circadian time (CT) 8 to CT 20, and cycloheximide delayed (by about 1 hr or less) the circadian rhythm from CT 20 to CT 8. The cycloheximide PRC was not due to different kinetics of recovery at different phases, as evidenced by similar recovery times when recovery from inhibition by cycloheximide was measured at two phases (a phase when cycloheximide produced no phase shift and a phase when cycloheximide delayed the rhythm).

Key concepts: Anisomycin, Cycloheximide, Aplysia, Protein biosynthesis, Puromycin, Protein synthesis inhibitor, Circadian rhythm, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Responses of the Circadian System in the Aplysia Eye to Inhibitors of Protein Synthesis — Research Paper | ScholarLens