Estimated fetal weight: Applicability to small‐ and large‐for‐gestational‐age fetus
Joseph M. Miller, Grace A. Kissling, Haywood L. Brown, Harvey A. Gabert
Abstract
Joseph M. Miller, Grace A. Kissling, Haywood L. Brown, Harvey A. Gabert
Abstract
Ultrasonic formulas using femur length and abdominal circumference with or without biparietal diameter were found to be highly accurate in predicting the weight of normal-sized term infants. The small-for-gestational age fetus, however, was overestimated and the large-for-gestational-age fetus was underestimated. The fetal weight formulas tested that were appropriate for the entire study group were not applicable to those fetuses having altered growth.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Ultrasonic formulas using femur length and abdominal circumference with or without biparietal diameter were found to be highly accurate in predicting the weight of normal-sized term infants. The small-for-gestational age fetus, however, was overestimated and the large-for-gestational-age fetus was underestimated. The fetal weight formulas tested that were appropriate for the entire study group were not applicable to those fetuses having altered growth.
Key concepts: Medicine, Fetus, Fetal weight, Gestational age, Gestation, Obstetrics, Fetal growth, Ultrasonography