1974•Scandinavian Journal of HaematologyRequires access

IgG Subclasses: Relationship to Clinical Aspects of Multiple Myeloma and Frequency Distribution among M‐Components

Peter H. Schur, Robert A. Kyle, Kurt J. Bloch, William J. Hammack, Shirley L. Rivers, Austin U. Sargent, Robert F. Ritchie, O. Ross McIntyre, William Curry Moloney, Lynda Wolfson

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The possible role of IgG subclasses in patients with M‐components or multiple myeloma was investigated. Among 900 patients with monoclonal proteins, the following IgG subclasses were identified: 77 % were IgG1; 14 % were IgG2; 6 % were IgG3; and 3 % were IgG4. The IgG of normal sera consists of 64–70 % IgG1, 23–28 % IgG2, 4–7 % IgG3 and 3–4 % IgG4. IgG1 M‐components were seen more frequently and IgG2 less frequently than had been expected. There were 389 patients with documented multiple myeloma assigned to four subgroups based upon IgG sub‐classification of their M‐components. These four groups resembled each other in many respects, but patients with IgG2 myeloma tended to develop hypercalcaemia and anaemia more frequently than patients with IgG1 or IgG4 myeloma; patients with IgG3 myeloma tended to develop anaemia and had azotaemia more frequently than patients with IgG1 or IgG4 myeloma.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The possible role of IgG subclasses in patients with M‐components or multiple myeloma was investigated. Among 900 patients with monoclonal proteins, the following IgG subclasses were identified: 77 % were IgG1; 14 % were IgG2; 6 % were IgG3; and 3 % were IgG4. The IgG of normal sera consists of 64–70 % IgG1, 23–28 % IgG2, 4–7 % IgG3 and 3–4 % IgG4. IgG1 M‐components were seen more frequently and IgG2 less frequently than had been expected. There were 389 patients with documented multiple myeloma assigned to four subgroups based upon IgG sub‐classification of their M‐components. These four groups resembled each other in many respects, but patients with IgG2 myeloma tended to develop hypercalcaemia and anaemia more frequently than patients with IgG1 or IgG4 myeloma; patients with IgG3 myeloma tended to develop anaemia and had azotaemia more frequently than patients with IgG1 or IgG4 myeloma.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The possible role of IgG subclasses in patients with M‐components or multiple myeloma was investigated. Among 900 patients with monoclonal proteins, the following IgG subclasses were identified: 77 % were IgG1; 14 % were IgG2; 6 % were IgG3; and 3 % were IgG4. The IgG of normal sera consists of 64–70 % IgG1, 23–28 % IgG2, 4–7 % IgG3 and 3–4 % IgG4. IgG1 M‐components were seen more frequently and IgG2 less frequently than had been expected. There were 389 patients with documented multiple myeloma assigned to four subgroups based upon IgG sub‐classification of their M‐components. These four groups resembled each other in many respects, but patients with IgG2 myeloma tended to develop hypercalcaemia and anaemia more frequently than patients with IgG1 or IgG4 myeloma; patients with IgG3 myeloma tended to develop anaemia and had azotaemia more frequently than patients with IgG1 or IgG4 myeloma.

Key concepts: Multiple myeloma, Immunoglobulin G, Myeloma protein, Immunology, Antibody, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IgG Subclasses: Relationship to Clinical Aspects of Multiple Myeloma and Frequency Distribution among M‐Components — Research Paper | ScholarLens