1973Acta Botanica NeerlandicaRequires access

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE MORPHOLOGY OF LEMNA GIBBA L. AND LEMNA MINOR L.

L. De Lange, A.H. Pieterse

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Fifteen strains of subgenus Lemna, collected in ponds and ditches in the western part of The Netherlands, strain G3 (previously described as Lemna gibba) and strains 6573 and F (previously described as Lemna minor) were aseptically cultured on M-medium in the presence and absence of EDDHA. When cultivated on EDDHA medium the strains showed a marked variation in the degree of gibbosity, whereas in the absence of the chelate all strains were more or less flat. The strains could be divided into two groups as far as the degree of gibbosity in the presence of EDDHA was concerned. There were no consistent differences in morphology between the two groups if cultured on the nutrient medium devoid of EDDHA. In the light of the present investigation distinction between Lemna gibba and Lemna minor seems not always possible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fifteen strains of subgenus Lemna, collected in ponds and ditches in the western part of The Netherlands, strain G3 (previously described as Lemna gibba) and strains 6573 and F (previously described as Lemna minor) were aseptically cultured on M-medium in the presence and absence of EDDHA. When cultivated on EDDHA medium the strains showed a marked variation in the degree of gibbosity, whereas in the absence of the chelate all strains were more or less flat. The strains could be divided into two groups as far as the degree of gibbosity in the presence of EDDHA was concerned. There were no consistent differences in morphology between the two groups if cultured on the nutrient medium devoid of EDDHA. In the light of the present investigation distinction between Lemna gibba and Lemna minor seems not always possible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fifteen strains of subgenus Lemna, collected in ponds and ditches in the western part of The Netherlands, strain G3 (previously described as Lemna gibba) and strains 6573 and F (previously described as Lemna minor) were aseptically cultured on M-medium in the presence and absence of EDDHA. When cultivated on EDDHA medium the strains showed a marked variation in the degree of gibbosity, whereas in the absence of the chelate all strains were more or less flat. The strains could be divided into two groups as far as the degree of gibbosity in the presence of EDDHA was concerned. There were no consistent differences in morphology between the two groups if cultured on the nutrient medium devoid of EDDHA. In the light of the present investigation distinction between Lemna gibba and Lemna minor seems not always possible.

Key concepts: Lemna gibba, Lemna minor, Lemna, Botany, Biology, Morphology (biology), Chemistry, Aquatic plant

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE MORPHOLOGY OF LEMNA GIBBA L. AND LEMNA MINOR L. — Research Paper | ScholarLens