2001AllergyRequires access

Eosinophil cationic protein and specific IgE in serum and nasal mucosa of patients with grass‐pollen‐allergic rhinitis and asthma

L. Sensi, Fabrizio Marcucci, E. Migali, G. Coniglio

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After allergen exposure, IgE-bearing mast cells surface in respiratory mucosa. Eosinophils are also recruited locally by chemotactic mediators; they are the main cell directly involved in the late phase of allergic inflammation. IgE antibody and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) are routinely determined mainly in serum although they exert their pathogenetic role more directly on mucosal surfaces. METHODS: We performed a comparative study of IgE antibody to grass and ECP on nasal mucosa and blood samples in order to evaluate the relevance of monitoring allergic inflammation in the target organ. Thirty-one patients and 10 nonatopic controls were enrolled in the protocol. Twenty-six subjects allergic to grass, 11 with rhinitis (group 1) and 15 with asthma and rhinitis (group 2), completed the study. Five patients dropped out. Specific IgE to grass and ECP was determined in nasal mucosa by our method based on in situ incubation. RESULTS: Serum IgE to grass did not increase during the pollen peak, as did nasal IgE, in group 1 from before the pollen peak, from 2.3 to 3.2 kU/l (P=0.02), and in group 2 at the pollen peak, from 4.8 to 12.2 kU/l (P=0.01). Serum ECP did not show any significant variation in group 1, but it increased at pollen peak from 6 to 11.2 microg/l (P=0.01) in group 2. Nasal ECP increased significantly in both groups even before the pollen peak. In group 1, ECP values rose from 15 to 39.9 microg/l (P=0.01). In group 2, ECP increase was much higher than in group 1, from 9 to 213 microg/l (P=0.001). Serum eosinophils, like nasal ECP, showed a significant increase of values from before the pollen peak in both groups, without correlation with serum ECP in rhinitic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both specific IgE and ECP in the nasal mucosa showed a better correlation with allergen exposure than serum evaluations. With an appropriate method, allergic inflammation may be best monitored in the nasal mucosa.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: After allergen exposure, IgE-bearing mast cells surface in respiratory mucosa. Eosinophils are also recruited locally by chemotactic mediators; they are the main cell directly involved in the late phase of allergic inflammation. IgE antibody and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) are routinely determined mainly in serum although they exert their pathogenetic role more directly on mucosal surfaces. METHODS: We performed a comparative study of IgE antibody to grass and ECP on nasal mucosa and blood samples in order to evaluate the relevance of monitoring allergic inflammation in the target organ. Thirty-one patients and 10 nonatopic controls were enrolled in the protocol. Twenty-six subjects allergic to grass, 11 with rhinitis (group 1) and 15 with asthma and rhinitis (group 2), completed the study. Five patients dropped out. Specific IgE to grass and ECP was determined in nasal mucosa by our method based on in situ incubation. RESULTS: Serum IgE to grass did not increase during the pollen peak, as did nasal IgE, in group 1 from before the pollen peak, from 2.3 to 3.2 kU/l (P=0.02), and in group 2 at the pollen peak, from 4.8 to 12.2 kU/l (P=0.01). Serum ECP did not show any significant variation in group 1, but it increased at pollen peak from 6 to 11.2 microg/l (P=0.01) in group 2. Nasal ECP increased significantly in both groups even before the pollen peak. In group 1, ECP values rose from 15 to 39.9 microg/l (P=0.01). In group 2, ECP increase was much higher than in group 1, from 9 to 213 microg/l (P=0.001). Serum eosinophils, like nasal ECP, showed a significant increase of values from before the pollen peak in both groups, without correlation with serum ECP in rhinitic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both specific IgE and ECP in the nasal mucosa showed a better correlation with allergen exposure than serum evaluations. With an appropriate method, allergic inflammation may be best monitored in the nasal mucosa.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: After allergen exposure, IgE-bearing mast cells surface in respiratory mucosa. Eosinophils are also recruited locally by chemotactic mediators; they are the main cell directly involved in the late phase of allergic inflammation. IgE antibody and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) are routinely determined mainly in serum although they exert their pathogenetic role more directly on mucosal surfaces. METHODS: We performed a comparative study of IgE antibody to grass and ECP on nasal mucosa and blood samples in order to evaluate the relevance of monitoring allergic inflammation in the target organ. Thirty-one patients and 10 nonatopic controls were enrolled in the protocol. Twenty-six subjects allergic to grass, 11 with rhinitis (group 1) and 15 with asthma and rhinitis (group 2), completed the study. Five patients dropped out. Specific IgE to grass and ECP was determined in nasal mucosa by our method based on in situ incubation. RESULTS: Serum IgE to grass did not increase during the pollen peak, as did nasal IgE, in group 1 from before the pollen peak, from 2.3 to 3.2 kU/l (P=0.02), and in group 2 at the pollen peak, from 4.8 to 12.2 kU/l (P=0.01). Serum ECP did not show any significant variation in group 1, but it increased at pollen peak from 6 to 11.2 microg/l (P=0.01) in group 2. Nasal ECP increased significantly in both groups even before the pollen peak. In group 1, ECP values rose from 15 to 39.9 microg/l (P=0.01). In group 2, ECP increase was much higher than in group 1, from 9 to 213 microg/l (P=0.001). Serum eosinophils, like nasal ECP, showed a significant increase of values from before the pollen peak in both groups, without correlation with serum ECP in rhinitic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both specific IgE and ECP in the nasal mucosa showed a better correlation with allergen exposure than serum evaluations. With an appropriate method, allergic inflammation may be best monitored in the nasal mucosa.

Key concepts: Eosinophil cationic protein, Immunoglobulin E, Mucous membrane of nose, Immunology, Eosinophil, Medicine, Asthma, Allergy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Eosinophil cationic protein and specific IgE in serum and nasal mucosa of patients with grass‐pollen‐allergic rhinitis and asthma — Research Paper | ScholarLens