2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Key privacy and anonymous protocols

Paolo D’Arco, Alfredo De Santis

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The growing need for user privacy protection has lead to the development of general notions and efficient tools for building privacy-preserving applications. Among them, the notion of key privacy in public-key encryption, which guarantees that an adversary is unable to tell with which public key a certain ciphertext has been produced, plays a key-role in the design of several anonymous protocols. Apparently, it seems to be unrelated to the security of the encrypted content, and it looks like just an additional property the encryption scheme can enjoy. In this paper we show that for a robust encryption scheme key privacy under chosen ciphertext attack implies non-malleability and, hence, security under chosen ciphertext attacks. Then, we look at two privacy-preserving protocols: secret sets and anonymous broadcast encryption. We prove that secret sets and anonymous broadcast are equivalent w.r.t. non-adaptive adversaries: the first can be used to design the second and vice versa. Finally, we revisit some previous constructions for secret sets, and we show the security properties they enjoy within a rigorously defined adversarial model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The growing need for user privacy protection has lead to the development of general notions and efficient tools for building privacy-preserving applications. Among them, the notion of key privacy in public-key encryption, which guarantees that an adversary is unable to tell with which public key a certain ciphertext has been produced, plays a key-role in the design of several anonymous protocols. Apparently, it seems to be unrelated to the security of the encrypted content, and it looks like just an additional property the encryption scheme can enjoy. In this paper we show that for a robust encryption scheme key privacy under chosen ciphertext attack implies non-malleability and, hence, security under chosen ciphertext attacks. Then, we look at two privacy-preserving protocols: secret sets and anonymous broadcast encryption. We prove that secret sets and anonymous broadcast are equivalent w.r.t. non-adaptive adversaries: the first can be used to design the second and vice versa. Finally, we revisit some previous constructions for secret sets, and we show the security properties they enjoy within a rigorously defined adversarial model.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The growing need for user privacy protection has lead to the development of general notions and efficient tools for building privacy-preserving applications. Among them, the notion of key privacy in public-key encryption, which guarantees that an adversary is unable to tell with which public key a certain ciphertext has been produced, plays a key-role in the design of several anonymous protocols. Apparently, it seems to be unrelated to the security of the encrypted content, and it looks like just an additional property the encryption scheme can enjoy. In this paper we show that for a robust encryption scheme key privacy under chosen ciphertext attack implies non-malleability and, hence, security under chosen ciphertext attacks. Then, we look at two privacy-preserving protocols: secret sets and anonymous broadcast encryption. We prove that secret sets and anonymous broadcast are equivalent w.r.t. non-adaptive adversaries: the first can be used to design the second and vice versa. Finally, we revisit some previous constructions for secret sets, and we show the security properties they enjoy within a rigorously defined adversarial model.

Key concepts: Computer security, Computer science, Ciphertext, Ciphertext indistinguishability, Encryption, Key (lock), Adversary, Semantic security

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Key privacy and anonymous protocols — Research Paper | ScholarLens