1989Journal of Physical OceanographyOpen access

Partition of energy Loss from the Barotropic Tide in Fjords

Brad de Young, S. Pond

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

As the barotropic tide propagates into and out of a fjord, it loses energy to friction, internal tides and high-frequency internal waves. Estimates of these losses for three British Columbia fjords, using current meter data, indicate that friction is negligible in two, but important in one inlet. The length and depth of the sill determines the importance of friction. When friction is not important, most of the energy lost goes into the internal tide but less than half of this energy propagates away from the sill. Simple models of the internal tide predict the correct energy transfer to satisfy an energy budget but do not agree with observations of the internal tidal energy flux away from the sill. Energy loss from the internal tide in or near the generation zone would account for the discrepancy. The energy flux of the high-frequency internal wave field is relatively small, about 2% of the energy lost.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As the barotropic tide propagates into and out of a fjord, it loses energy to friction, internal tides and high-frequency internal waves. Estimates of these losses for three British Columbia fjords, using current meter data, indicate that friction is negligible in two, but important in one inlet. The length and depth of the sill determines the importance of friction. When friction is not important, most of the energy lost goes into the internal tide but less than half of this energy propagates away from the sill. Simple models of the internal tide predict the correct energy transfer to satisfy an energy budget but do not agree with observations of the internal tidal energy flux away from the sill. Energy loss from the internal tide in or near the generation zone would account for the discrepancy. The energy flux of the high-frequency internal wave field is relatively small, about 2% of the energy lost.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As the barotropic tide propagates into and out of a fjord, it loses energy to friction, internal tides and high-frequency internal waves. Estimates of these losses for three British Columbia fjords, using current meter data, indicate that friction is negligible in two, but important in one inlet. The length and depth of the sill determines the importance of friction. When friction is not important, most of the energy lost goes into the internal tide but less than half of this energy propagates away from the sill. Simple models of the internal tide predict the correct energy transfer to satisfy an energy budget but do not agree with observations of the internal tidal energy flux away from the sill. Energy loss from the internal tide in or near the generation zone would account for the discrepancy. The energy flux of the high-frequency internal wave field is relatively small, about 2% of the energy lost.

Key concepts: Sill, Barotropic fluid, Internal tide, Internal wave, Energy flux, Fjord, Geology, Inlet

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Partition of energy Loss from the Barotropic Tide in Fjords — Research Paper | ScholarLens