1993Marine Ecology Progress SeriesOpen access

Seasonal acclimatization of eelgrass Zostera marina growth to light

Birgit Olesen, Kaj Sand‐Jensen

Open full text 133 citations

Abstract

Eelgrass Zostera marina L, was collected in March (7 "C), August (21 'C) and October (15 "C) in a Danish embayment.Growth and acclimat~zation of the plants were measured in the laboratory at ambient temperature and different photon flux density.W e ~g h t loss in the dark increased with temperature whereas the slope of growth versus low light intensities was highest at 15 "C.The light compensation point for zero growth was, therefore, lower (18.5 pm01 m-2 S-') for October plants than for March (28.3 pm01 m-' S-') and August (47.3pm01 m-' S -' ) plants.Biomass allocation from rhizomes to leaves increased with reduced light availability and rhizomes r e q u ~r e d more light than leaves to maintain the biomass.Leaf weight normalized to area declined at low l ~g h t , which together with allocation from rhizomes caused sustained leaf elongation for several weeks, despite severe shading and loss of plant weight.Hence, common determinations of leaf turnover of seagrasses by tagging techniques will always remain positive and cannot be applied to determine the growth energetics at low light under non-steady-state conditions.The experimental light demands for zero growth for March and October plants were equivalent to 11 % of in situ surface irradiance, which is close to estimated light levels at eelgrass depth limits.Eelgrass biomass, however, is expected to increase at the depth limit during summer and to b e expended for survival at low light during winter.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Eelgrass Zostera marina L, was collected in March (7 "C), August (21 'C) and October (15 "C) in a Danish embayment.Growth and acclimat~zation of the plants were measured in the laboratory at ambient temperature and different photon flux density.W e ~g h t loss in the dark increased with temperature whereas the slope of growth versus low light intensities was highest at 15 "C.The light compensation point for zero growth was, therefore, lower (18.5 pm01 m-2 S-') for October plants than for March (28.3 pm01 m-' S-') and August (47.3pm01 m-' S -' ) plants.Biomass allocation from rhizomes to leaves increased with reduced light availability and rhizomes r e q u ~r e d more light than leaves to maintain the biomass.Leaf weight normalized to area declined at low l ~g h t , which together with allocation from rhizomes caused sustained leaf elongation for several weeks, despite severe shading and loss of plant weight.Hence, common determinations of leaf turnover of seagrasses by tagging techniques will always remain positive and cannot be applied to determine the growth energetics at low light under non-steady-state conditions.The experimental light demands for zero growth for March and October plants were equivalent to 11 % of in situ surface irradiance, which is close to estimated light levels at eelgrass depth limits.Eelgrass biomass, however, is expected to increase at the depth limit during summer and to b e expended for survival at low light during winter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 133 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Eelgrass Zostera marina L, was collected in March (7 "C), August (21 'C) and October (15 "C) in a Danish embayment.Growth and acclimat~zation of the plants were measured in the laboratory at ambient temperature and different photon flux density.W e ~g h t loss in the dark increased with temperature whereas the slope of growth versus low light intensities was highest at 15 "C.The light compensation point for zero growth was, therefore, lower (18.5 pm01 m-2 S-') for October plants than for March (28.3 pm01 m-' S-') and August (47.3pm01 m-' S -' ) plants.Biomass allocation from rhizomes to leaves increased with reduced light availability and rhizomes r e q u ~r e d more light than leaves to maintain the biomass.Leaf weight normalized to area declined at low l ~g h t , which together with allocation from rhizomes caused sustained leaf elongation for several weeks, despite severe shading and loss of plant weight.Hence, common determinations of leaf turnover of seagrasses by tagging techniques will always remain positive and cannot be applied to determine the growth energetics at low light under non-steady-state conditions.The experimental light demands for zero growth for March and October plants were equivalent to 11 % of in situ surface irradiance, which is close to estimated light levels at eelgrass depth limits.Eelgrass biomass, however, is expected to increase at the depth limit during summer and to b e expended for survival at low light during winter.

Key concepts: Zostera marina, Acclimatization, Seagrass, Biology, Ecology, Environmental science, Fishery, Ecosystem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seasonal acclimatization of eelgrass Zostera marina growth to light — Research Paper | ScholarLens