1996Environmental and Molecular MutagenesisRequires access

Mutational specificity: Mutation frequencies butnot mutant frequencies in Big Blue® mice fit a Poisson distribution

Hiroshi Nishino, Daniel J. Schaid, Victoria L. Buettner, Jan Haavik, Steve S. Sommer

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Transgenic mutation assays generally use mutant frequencies to estimate mutation frequencies but the degree to which clonal expansion inflates mutant frequencies is largely unknown. Mutant frequency is defined as the fraction of cells carrying mutations in the gene of interest and, according to the standard Big Blue protocol, is determined by dividing the number of mutant plaques by the total number of plaques screened. Mutation frequency is determined as the fraction of cells carrying definitely independent mutations and therefore requires correction for clonal expansion. Mutant and mutation frequencies were determined for brain, thymus and male germ cells of four mice from two age groups (3-versus 10-month old). The mutant frequency in thymus differed significantly between 3- and 10-month old mice (P < 0.05). By sequencing all mutants, the mutation frequency (i.e., corrected for jackpot mutations) in thymus was determined and was not significantly different between 3- and 10-month old mice. Mutant frequency does not fit a Poisson distribution, but mutation frequency corrected for jackpot mutations is substantially less variable and does fit a Poisson distribution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transgenic mutation assays generally use mutant frequencies to estimate mutation frequencies but the degree to which clonal expansion inflates mutant frequencies is largely unknown. Mutant frequency is defined as the fraction of cells carrying mutations in the gene of interest and, according to the standard Big Blue protocol, is determined by dividing the number of mutant plaques by the total number of plaques screened. Mutation frequency is determined as the fraction of cells carrying definitely independent mutations and therefore requires correction for clonal expansion. Mutant and mutation frequencies were determined for brain, thymus and male germ cells of four mice from two age groups (3-versus 10-month old). The mutant frequency in thymus differed significantly between 3- and 10-month old mice (P < 0.05). By sequencing all mutants, the mutation frequency (i.e., corrected for jackpot mutations) in thymus was determined and was not significantly different between 3- and 10-month old mice. Mutant frequency does not fit a Poisson distribution, but mutation frequency corrected for jackpot mutations is substantially less variable and does fit a Poisson distribution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transgenic mutation assays generally use mutant frequencies to estimate mutation frequencies but the degree to which clonal expansion inflates mutant frequencies is largely unknown. Mutant frequency is defined as the fraction of cells carrying mutations in the gene of interest and, according to the standard Big Blue protocol, is determined by dividing the number of mutant plaques by the total number of plaques screened. Mutation frequency is determined as the fraction of cells carrying definitely independent mutations and therefore requires correction for clonal expansion. Mutant and mutation frequencies were determined for brain, thymus and male germ cells of four mice from two age groups (3-versus 10-month old). The mutant frequency in thymus differed significantly between 3- and 10-month old mice (P < 0.05). By sequencing all mutants, the mutation frequency (i.e., corrected for jackpot mutations) in thymus was determined and was not significantly different between 3- and 10-month old mice. Mutant frequency does not fit a Poisson distribution, but mutation frequency corrected for jackpot mutations is substantially less variable and does fit a Poisson distribution.

Key concepts: Mutant, Mutation, Mutation frequency, Biology, Genetics, Mutation rate, Molecular biology, Poisson distribution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mutational specificity: Mutation frequencies butnot mutant frequencies in Big Blue® mice fit a Poisson distribution — Research Paper | ScholarLens